Andrew Cole
Impact in
- Classics top 2%
- Medieval Literature and History
- Computer Science Applications top 10%
- Online Learning and Analytics
Papers in
-
- Healthcare Systems and Challenges 5
- Health Services Management and Policy 5
- Health Literacy and Information Accessibility 2
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications 2
- Classics 8
- Medieval Literature and History 8
- Co-authors
- Nicole Weber (1 shared paper)Edwin P. Kirk (1 shared paper)Nadine A. Kasparian (1 shared paper)Gary F. Sholler (1 shared paper)David S. Winlaw (1 shared paper)Christopher J. Anderson (1 shared paper)Mike Allen (2 shared papers)Andrew Galloway (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Speculum (2 papers)Online Learning (1 paper)Minnesota Review (1 paper)Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies (1 paper)South Atlantic Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Andrew Cole
35 papers receiving 343 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Classics 63
- Computer Science Applications 40
- Education 152
- History 40
- Literature and Literary Theory 31
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Cole
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Cole more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Cole
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Cole. The network helps show where Andrew Cole may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Cole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 118 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 42 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 20 | Fund-raising. The giving game. | 1994 | 2 |
About Andrew Cole
Andrew Cole is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Classics, Sociology and Political Science, Education and Social Psychology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (8 papers), Online and Blended Learning (5 papers), Healthcare Systems and Challenges (5 papers), Health Services Management and Policy (5 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (4 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (2 papers), Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (2 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (63 citations), Computer Science Applications (40 citations), Education (152 citations), History (40 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (31 citations). Andrew Cole has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nicole Weber, Edwin P. Kirk, Nadine A. Kasparian, Gary F. Sholler, David S. Winlaw, Christopher J. Anderson, Mike Allen, Andrew Galloway, William J. Speake and Oliver Peacock. Their work appears in journals such as Speculum, Online Learning, Minnesota Review, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies and South Atlantic Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.