Andrew C. Stanfield

4.4k citations
64 papers · 2.4k indexed · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew C. Stanfield

63 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Andrew C. Stanfield
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.7k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 884
  • Genetics 648
  • Clinical Psychology 474
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 251
Replace Stephanie H. Ameis with:
Stephanie H. Ameis Canada
Wouter Staal Netherlands
Sarah Curran United Kingdom
Amber Ruigrok United Kingdom
Clodagh M. Murphy United Kingdom
David A. Ziegler United States
Elysa J. Marco United States
Marieke Langen Netherlands
Rebecca Grzadzinski United States
Quinton Deeley United Kingdom
Andrew C. Stanfield relative to Stephanie H. Ameis Canada Stephanie H. Ameis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Stephanie H. Ameis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew C. Stanfield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew C. Stanfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew C. Stanfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew C. Stanfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew C. Stanfield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew C. Stanfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew C. Stanfield. The network helps show where Andrew C. Stanfield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew C. Stanfield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew C. Stanfield Line = papers co-authored together Andrew C. Stanfield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20244
2 20242
3 202217
4 202115
5 20212
6 202026
7 202011
8 20194
9 201533
10 2012199
11 201258
12 2011262
13 201040
14 200924
15 200863
16 200867
17 2007354
18 200757
19 200737
20 200744

About Andrew C. Stanfield

Andrew C. Stanfield is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Genetics and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (38 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (26 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (17 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (13 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (12 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (8 papers) and Congenital heart defects research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.7k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (884 citations), Genetics (648 citations), Clinical Psychology (474 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (251 citations). Andrew C. Stanfield has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Stephen M. Lawrie, Andrew M. McIntosh, Ruth C. M. Philip, Heather C. Whalley, Eve C. Johnstone, Jérémy Hall, Michael D. Spencer, Maria R. Dauvermann, T. William J. Moorhead and David G. C. Owens. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging, NeuroImage and Research in autism spectrum disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026