Peter C. Kind

16.3k citations
112 papers · 3.2k indexed · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

Peter C. Kind

103 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Peter C. Kind
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Developmental Neuroscience 420
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.5k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.3k
  • Genetics 1.1k
  • Cell Biology 403
Replace Zhanyan Fu with:
Zhanyan Fu United States
Pavel V. Belichenko United States
Vitaly A. Klyachko United States
Marc V. Fuccillo United States
Deniz Atasoy United States
Tomomi Shimogori Japan
Daisuke Hattori United States
Tetsuo Yamamori Japan
J. Tiago Gonçalves United States
Matthew S. Kayser United States
Peter C. Kind relative to Zhanyan Fu United States Zhanyan Fu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Zhanyan Fu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter C. Kind

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter C. Kind's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter C. Kind with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter C. Kind more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter C. Kind

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter C. Kind. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter C. Kind. The network helps show where Peter C. Kind may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter C. Kind, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter C. Kind Line = papers co-authored together Peter C. Kind links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010195
2 2012191
3 2001175
4 1997172
5 2001147
6 2012147
7 2002108
8 199497
9 201274
10 201574
11 200267
12 201666
13 200864
14 201763
15 201562
16 201260
17 201660
18 201954
19 200952
20 201450

About Peter C. Kind

Peter C. Kind is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 112 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (38 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (33 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (22 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (17 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (10 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (9 papers), Congenital heart defects research (8 papers) and Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (420 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.3k citations), Genetics (1.1k citations) and Cell Biology (403 citations). Peter C. Kind has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Frank Sengpiel, Lasani S. Wijetunge, David J. A. Wyllie, Colin Blakemore, Reha S. Erzurumlu, Sally M. Till, Giles E. Hardingham, Donald E. Mitchell, Susan Hockfield and Mark F. Bear. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Cell Reports, Molecular Autism, Nature Communications and European Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026