Andrew C. Oates

9.5k total citations
109 papers, 6.8k citations indexed

About

Andrew C. Oates is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew C. Oates has authored 109 papers receiving a total of 6.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 84 papers in Molecular Biology, 48 papers in Cell Biology and 15 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Andrew C. Oates's work include Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (43 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (37 papers) and Congenital heart defects research (25 papers). Andrew C. Oates is often cited by papers focused on Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (43 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (37 papers) and Congenital heart defects research (25 papers). Andrew C. Oates collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Andrew C. Oates's co-authors include Robert K. Ho, Luis G. Morelli, Saúl Ares, Judith E. Layton, Barry H. Paw, Christian Schröter, Leonard I. Zon, Stephen J. P. Pratt, Graham J. Lieschke and Alister C. Ward and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Cell.

In The Last Decade

Andrew C. Oates

107 papers receiving 6.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew C. Oates Germany 46 4.6k 2.7k 1.1k 619 571 109 6.8k
Nicholas H. Brown United Kingdom 52 4.7k 1.0× 3.9k 1.4× 932 0.8× 571 0.9× 1.1k 1.9× 106 8.1k
Pernille Rørth Germany 35 4.0k 0.9× 3.0k 1.1× 886 0.8× 479 0.8× 1.3k 2.3× 46 6.2k
Franck Perez France 43 4.8k 1.0× 3.4k 1.3× 660 0.6× 440 0.7× 660 1.2× 145 7.4k
Nicolas Tapon United Kingdom 38 4.8k 1.0× 5.2k 1.9× 568 0.5× 318 0.5× 616 1.1× 64 7.6k
Yannis Kalaidzidis Germany 35 4.4k 1.0× 2.9k 1.1× 471 0.4× 471 0.8× 349 0.6× 79 6.6k
Giorgio Scita Italy 57 5.3k 1.2× 4.8k 1.8× 670 0.6× 541 0.9× 823 1.4× 141 9.8k
Denise J. Montell United States 50 5.2k 1.1× 3.9k 1.4× 1.2k 1.1× 643 1.0× 1.7k 3.0× 113 8.5k
Jason R. Swedlow United Kingdom 51 7.1k 1.5× 3.0k 1.1× 347 0.3× 615 1.0× 395 0.7× 107 9.7k
Suzanne Eaton Germany 50 5.5k 1.2× 4.6k 1.7× 660 0.6× 887 1.4× 1.3k 2.3× 83 9.2k
Robert A. Lindquist United States 10 4.8k 1.1× 1.3k 0.5× 607 0.5× 368 0.6× 349 0.6× 10 7.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew C. Oates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew C. Oates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew C. Oates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew C. Oates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew C. Oates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew C. Oates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew C. Oates. The network helps show where Andrew C. Oates may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew C. Oates

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew C. Oates. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew C. Oates based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew C. Oates. Andrew C. Oates is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hannebelle, Mélanie T. M., Tomáš Lukeš, Chiara Toniolo, et al.. (2024). Open-source microscope add-on for structured illumination microscopy. Nature Communications. 15(1). 1550–1550. 12 indexed citations
2.
Rohde, Laurel A., Guillaume Valentin, Sundar Ram Naganathan, et al.. (2024). Cell-autonomous timing drives the vertebrate segmentation clock’s wave pattern. eLife. 13. 2 indexed citations
3.
Rohde, Laurel A., Guillaume Valentin, Sundar Ram Naganathan, et al.. (2024). Cell-autonomous timing drives the vertebrate segmentation clock’s wave pattern. eLife. 13. 2 indexed citations
4.
Rohde, Laurel A., et al.. (2023). A Robotic Surgery Platform for Automated Tissue Micromanipulation in Zebrafish Embryos. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 9(1). 327–334. 2 indexed citations
5.
Uriu, Koichiro, Bo‐Kai Liao, Andrew C. Oates, & Luis G. Morelli. (2021). From local resynchronization to global pattern recovery in the zebrafish segmentation clock. eLife. 10. 16 indexed citations
6.
Oates, Andrew C., et al.. (2019). What are you synching about? Emerging complexity of Notch signaling in the segmentation clock. Developmental Biology. 460(1). 40–54. 43 indexed citations
7.
Huitema, Leonie F. A., Alexander Apschner, Josi Peterson-Maduro, et al.. (2018). Segmentation of the zebrafish axial skeleton relies on notochord sheath cells and not on the segmentation clock. eLife. 7. 63 indexed citations
8.
Ferguson, Chantal, Andrew C. Nelson, Guillaume Valentin, et al.. (2015). Tbx6, Mesp-b and Ripply1 regulate the onset of skeletal myogenesis in zebrafish. Development. 142(6). 1159–68. 41 indexed citations
9.
Rost, Fabian, et al.. (2014). Chevron formation of the zebrafish muscle segments. Journal of Experimental Biology. 217(21). 3870–3882. 15 indexed citations
10.
Roellig, Daniela, Luis G. Morelli, Saúl Ares, Frank Jülicher, & Andrew C. Oates. (2011). Enhanced SnapShot: The Segmentation Clock. Cell. 145(5). 800–800.e1. 6 indexed citations
11.
Lieschke, Graham J., et al.. (2009). Zebrafish. Methods in molecular biology. 3 indexed citations
12.
Riedel‐Kruse, Ingmar H., Claudia Müller, & Andrew C. Oates. (2007). Synchrony Dynamics During Initiation, Failure, and Rescue of the Segmentation Clock. Science. 317(5846). 1911–1915. 201 indexed citations
13.
Echeverri, Karen & Andrew C. Oates. (2006). Coordination of symmetric cyclic gene expression during somitogenesis by Suppressor of Hairless involves regulation of retinoic acid catabolism. Developmental Biology. 301(2). 388–403. 41 indexed citations
14.
Oates, Andrew C., Laurel A. Rohde, & Robert K. Ho. (2005). Generation of segment polarity in the paraxial mesoderm of the zebrafish through a T-box-dependent inductive event. Developmental Biology. 283(1). 204–214. 20 indexed citations
15.
Hogan, Benjamin M., Michael Hunter, Andrew C. Oates, et al.. (2004). Zebrafish gcm2 is required for gill filament budding from pharyngeal ectoderm. Developmental Biology. 276(2). 508–522. 56 indexed citations
16.
Brownlie, Alison, Candace Hersey, Andrew C. Oates, et al.. (2003). Characterization of embryonic globin genes of the zebrafish. Developmental Biology. 255(1). 48–61. 133 indexed citations
17.
Lyons, Susan E., et al.. (2000). A novel myeloid-restricted zebrafish C/EBP with a potent transcriptional activation domain.. Blood. 96. 1 indexed citations
18.
Lyons, Susan E., et al.. (1999). A unique myeloid-specific C/EBP transcription factor is present in zebrafish.. Blood. 94. 1 indexed citations
19.
Lackmann, Martin, Ailsa G. Harpur, Andrew C. Oates, et al.. (1998). Biomolecular Interaction Analysis of IFNγ-Induced Signaling Events in Whole-Cell Lysates: Prevalence of Latent STAT1 in High-Molecular Weight Complexes. Growth Factors. 16(1). 39–51. 46 indexed citations
20.
Oates, Andrew C., et al.. (1998). Embryonic expression and activity of doughnut, a second RYK homolog in Drosophila. Mechanisms of Development. 78(1-2). 165–169. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026