Andrew Balmer

863 total citations
35 papers, 544 citations indexed

About

Andrew Balmer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Molecular Biology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Balmer has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 544 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 7 papers in Molecular Biology and 5 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Andrew Balmer's work include Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (5 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers) and Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (3 papers). Andrew Balmer is often cited by papers focused on Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (5 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers) and Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (3 papers). Andrew Balmer collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Andrew Balmer's co-authors include Paul Martin, Susan Molyneux‐Hodgson, Bárbara Ribeiro, Claire Marris, Jane Calvert, Pablo Schyfter, Adrian Mackenzie, Emma Frow, Matthew Kearnes and Ruth Bartlett and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Research Policy and Trends in biotechnology.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Balmer

32 papers receiving 500 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Andrew Balmer United Kingdom	11	159	129	93	65	59	35	544
Dirk Stemerding Netherlands	13	114 0.7×	89 0.7×	30 0.3×	70 1.1×	45 0.8×	51	582
Pablo Schyfter United Kingdom	11	97 0.6×	114 0.9×	60 0.6×	38 0.6×	55 0.9×	25	398
Hanne Andersen Denmark	16	139 0.9×	75 0.6×	122 1.3×	26 0.4×	30 0.5×	45	755
Gaymon Bennett United States	8	88 0.6×	269 2.1×	58 0.6×	48 0.7×	40 0.7×	25	523
Mike Fortun United States	12	166 1.0×	99 0.8×	27 0.3×	149 2.3×	15 0.3×	23	741
N. Derek Brown United States	8	185 1.2×	50 0.4×	15 0.2×	69 1.1×	14 0.2×	12	545
Gili Marbach‐Ad United States	21	100 0.6×	259 2.0×	56 0.6×	69 1.1×	139 2.4×	71	1.7k
Kendall Powell United States	13	76 0.5×	97 0.8×	27 0.3×	162 2.5×	29 0.5×	83	638
Stephen Crowley United States	10	109 0.7×	13 0.1×	224 2.4×	26 0.4×	55 0.9×	21	421
Marie‐Christine P. J. Knippels Netherlands	14	141 0.9×	66 0.5×	26 0.3×	26 0.4×	39 0.7×	26	891

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Balmer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Balmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Balmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Balmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Balmer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Balmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Balmer. The network helps show where Andrew Balmer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Balmer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Balmer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Balmer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Balmer. Andrew Balmer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Buse, Christina, et al.. (2023). ‘Ways of being’ in the domestic garden for people living with dementia: doing, sensing and playing. Ageing and Society. 44(11). 2351–2375. 4 indexed citations

Ribeiro, Bárbara, et al.. (2022). The digitalisation paradox of everyday scientific labour: How mundane knowledge work is amplified and diversified in the biosciences. Research Policy. 52(1). 104607–104607. 18 indexed citations

Balmer, Andrew. (2021). Painting with data: Alternative aesthetics of qualitative research. The Sociological Review. 69(6). 1143–1161. 11 indexed citations

Balmer, Andrew & Michael Durrant. (2021). Simmel and Shakespeare on Lying and Love. Cultural Sociology. 15(3). 346–363. 4 indexed citations

Balmer, Andrew. (2020). Soft-Wired Illusionism vs. the Meta-Problem of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 27. 1 indexed citations

Balmer, Andrew, et al.. (2020). The Temporal Uses of Moral Things: Manifesting, Anchoring and Conserving Caring Relations within the Sensorium. Sociology. 55(3). 619–640. 2 indexed citations

Warde, Alan, Vanessa May, Bridget Byrne, et al.. (2019). Michael Banton and Sociology. Sociology. 53(5). NP1–NP10. 1 indexed citations

Balmer, Andrew, Susan Molyneux‐Hodgson, Felicity Callard, & Des Fitzgerald. (2018). “Could we meet?”: A conversation on collaboration, feeling and failure. BioSocieties. 13(3). 668–674. 5 indexed citations

Balmer, Andrew, et al.. (2017). Engaging the Senses, Understanding Publics: Research Methods, Science Engagement, and Synthetic Biology. Trends in biotechnology. 35(11). 1015–1017. 5 indexed citations

10.

Balmer, Andrew & Anne Murcott. (2017). The craft of writing in sociology: Developing the argument in undergraduate essays and dissertations. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).

11.

Balmer, Andrew, Jane Calvert, Claire Marris, et al.. (2016). Five rules of thumb for post-ELSI interdisciplinary collaborations. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 3(1). 73–80. 71 indexed citations

12.

Balmer, Andrew, Jane Calvert, Claire Marris, et al.. (2015). Taking roles in interdisciplinary collaborations. Science & Technology Studies. 28(3). 3–25. 1 indexed citations

13.

Balmer, Andrew. (2015). Telling Tales: Some episodes from the multiple lives of the polygraph machine. 104–118. 1 indexed citations

14.

Balmer, Andrew, et al.. (2013). Left to their own devices: Post-ELSI, ethical equipment and the International Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM) Competition. BioSocieties. 8(3). 311–335. 34 indexed citations

15.

Balmer, Andrew & Susan Molyneux‐Hodgson. (2013). Bacterial cultures: ontologies of bacteria and engineering expertise at the nexus of synthetic biology and water services. Engineering Studies. 5(1). 59–73. 10 indexed citations

16.

Balmer, Andrew, et al.. (2009). Craig Venter and the Re-programming of Life: How metaphors shape and perform ethical discourses in the media presentation of synthetic biology. 9 indexed citations

17.

Balmer, Andrew & Paul Martin. (2008). Synthetic Biology: Social and Ethical Challenges. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 55 indexed citations

18.

Smart, Andrew, Richard Tutton, Richard Ashcroft, et al.. (2008). Social Inclusivity VS Analytical Acuity? A Qualitative Study of UK Researchers Regarding the Inclusion of Minority Ethnic Groups in Biobanks. Medical Law International. 9(2). 169–190. 5 indexed citations

19.

Balmer, Andrew, et al.. (1996). Médullo-épithéliomes: Présentation de 3 cas. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde. 208(5). 377–380. 3 indexed citations

20.

Munier, Francis L., et al.. (1987). [Historical notes on retinoblastoma: apropos of 2 ancient terracotta figures].. PubMed. 107(7). 591–7. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact