Emma Frow
- Molecular Biology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Biomedical Engineering
- Information Systems and Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jane CalvertDavid J. GraingerAdrian MackenzieAndrew BalmerClaire MarrisSusan Molyneux‐HodgsonPaul MartinMatthew Kearnes
- Topics
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (8 papers)Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (7 papers)Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Emma Frow
25 papers receiving 531 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Molecular Biology 242
- Sociology and Political Science 102
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 84
- Biomedical Engineering 73
- Information Systems and Management 56
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Frow
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Frow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Frow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Frow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Frow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Frow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Frow. The network helps show where Emma Frow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Frow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Frow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Frow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Frow. Emma Frow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 49 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 71 | |
| 11 | The Synthetic Yeast Project as a Topic for Social Scientific Investigation | 2 |
| 12 | Taking roles in interdisciplinary collaborations | 1 |
| 13 | Rhetorics and practices of democratization in synthetic biology | 3 |
| 14 | 97 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About Emma Frow
Emma Frow is a scholar working on Biophysics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Information Systems and Management, having authored 27 papers that have together received 562 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (8 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (7 papers) and Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (56 citations), Business and International Management (12 citations) and Health Informatics (6 citations). Emma Frow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jane Calvert, David J. Grainger, Adrian Mackenzie, Andrew Balmer, Claire Marris, Susan Molyneux‐Hodgson, Paul Martin, Matthew Kearnes, Pablo Schyfter and Michelle Rourke. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, PLoS ONE and Biochemical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.