Emma Frow

1.1k total citations
27 papers, 562 citations indexed

About

Emma Frow is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Frow has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 562 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Molecular Biology, 8 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 6 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Recurrent topics in Emma Frow's work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (8 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (7 papers) and Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development (6 papers). Emma Frow is often cited by papers focused on CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (8 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (7 papers) and Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development (6 papers). Emma Frow collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Emma Frow's co-authors include Jane Calvert, David J. Grainger, Adrian Mackenzie, Andrew Balmer, Claire Marris, Susan Molyneux‐Hodgson, Paul Martin, Matthew Kearnes, Pablo Schyfter and Michelle Rourke and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, PLoS ONE and Biochemical Journal.

In The Last Decade

Emma Frow

25 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emma Frow United States	16	242	102	84	73	56	27	562
Dirk Stemerding Netherlands	13	89 0.4×	114 1.1×	70 0.8×	45 0.6×	30 0.5×	51	582
Andrew Balmer United Kingdom	11	129 0.5×	159 1.6×	65 0.8×	59 0.8×	93 1.7×	35	544
Pablo Schyfter United Kingdom	11	114 0.5×	97 1.0×	38 0.5×	55 0.8×	60 1.1×	25	398
Gaymon Bennett United States	8	269 1.1×	88 0.9×	48 0.6×	40 0.5×	58 1.0×	25	523
Jason Delborne United States	19	248 1.0×	188 1.8×	63 0.8×	28 0.4×	14 0.3×	43	698
Amber Dance United Kingdom	13	177 0.7×	36 0.4×	47 0.6×	76 1.0×	27 0.5×	103	685
Roberta Kwok United Kingdom	13	341 1.4×	51 0.5×	28 0.3×	121 1.7×	39 0.7×	42	869
Markus Schmidt Austria	19	704 2.9×	86 0.8×	55 0.7×	136 1.9×	20 0.4×	42	1.2k
J. Benjamin Hurlbut United States	11	265 1.1×	66 0.6×	85 1.0×	18 0.2×	8 0.1×	21	449
Sally Stares United Kingdom	13	142 0.6×	313 3.1×	76 0.9×	19 0.3×	20 0.4×	24	841

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Frow

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Frow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Frow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Frow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Frow

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Frow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Frow. The network helps show where Emma Frow may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Frow

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Frow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Frow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Frow. Emma Frow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Davenport, Peter W., et al.. (2024). A bumpy road ahead for genetic biocontainment. Nature Communications. 15(1). 650–650. 18 indexed citations

Richey, A., et al.. (2021). Weighing up the evidence used by direct-to-consumer stem cell businesses. Stem Cell Reports. 16(12). 2852–2860. 10 indexed citations

Frow, Emma, et al.. (2021). Exploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies. PLoS ONE. 16(9). e0257327–e0257327. 5 indexed citations

Holowko, Maciej B., Emma Frow, Janet C. Reid, Michelle Rourke, & Claudia E. Vickers. (2020). Building a biofoundry. PubMed. 6(1). ysaa026–ysaa026. 49 indexed citations

Frow, Emma, et al.. (2019). Characterizing Direct-to-Consumer Stem Cell Businesses in the Southwest United States. Stem Cell Reports. 13(2). 247–253. 16 indexed citations

Delborne, Jason, et al.. (2018). ‘Mapping research and governance needs for gene drives’. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 5(sup1). S4–S12. 18 indexed citations

Frow, Emma & Michael R. Caplan. (2018). Promoting Career Reflection among Freshman BME Students.

Kuzma, Jennifer, Fred Gould, Zachary Brown, et al.. (2017). A roadmap for gene drives: using institutional analysis and development to frame research needs and governance in a systems context. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 5(sup1). S13–S39. 35 indexed citations

McGurrin, Patrick & Emma Frow. (2017). Governing citizen use of brain stimulation technologies: what role for scientists?. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 5(1). 117–121. 2 indexed citations

10.

Balmer, Andrew, Jane Calvert, Claire Marris, et al.. (2016). Five rules of thumb for post-ELSI interdisciplinary collaborations. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 3(1). 73–80. 71 indexed citations

11.

Calvert, Jane & Emma Frow. (2015). The Synthetic Yeast Project as a Topic for Social Scientific Investigation. Edinburgh Research Explorer. 15(2015). 27–37. 2 indexed citations

12.

Balmer, Andrew, Jane Calvert, Claire Marris, et al.. (2015). Taking roles in interdisciplinary collaborations. Science & Technology Studies. 28(3). 3–25. 1 indexed citations

13.

Frow, Emma. (2015). Rhetorics and practices of democratization in synthetic biology. 174–187. 3 indexed citations

14.

Balmer, Andrew, Jane Calvert, Claire Marris, et al.. (2015). Taking Roles in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: Reflections on Working in Post-ELSI Spaces in the UK Synthetic Biology Community. Science & Technology Studies. 28(3). 3–25. 97 indexed citations

15.

Davies, Gail, Emma Frow, & Sabina Leonelli. (2013). Bigger, faster, better? Rhetorics and practices of large-scale research in contemporary bioscience. BioSocieties. 8(4). 386–396. 29 indexed citations

16.

Frow, Emma & Jane Calvert. (2013). ‘Can simple biological systems be built from standardized interchangeable parts?’ Negotiating biology and engineering in a synthetic biology competition. Engineering Studies. 5(1). 42–58. 19 indexed citations

17.

Frow, Emma. (2012). Drawing a line: Setting guidelines for digital image processing in scientific journal articles. Social Studies of Science. 42(3). 369–392. 23 indexed citations

18.

Frow, Emma. (2009). A forum for ‘doing society and genomics’. EMBO Reports. 10(4). 318–321. 3 indexed citations

19.

Frow, Emma, et al.. (2009). The politics of plants. Food Security. 1(1). 17–23. 21 indexed citations

20.

Frow, Emma, Jill Reckless, & David J. Grainger. (2004). Tools for anti‐inflammatory drug design: In vitro models of leukocyte migration. Medicinal Research Reviews. 24(3). 276–298. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact