Andrew A. Pierce

6.4k total citations
17 papers, 792 citations indexed

About

Andrew A. Pierce is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew A. Pierce has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 792 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and 4 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Andrew A. Pierce's work include Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). Andrew A. Pierce is often cited by papers focused on Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). Andrew A. Pierce collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Andrew A. Pierce's co-authors include Allison Xu, Michael H. Ferkin, Louise E. Olofsson, Javier delBarco‐Trillo, Stan Franklin, Stephanie M. Correa, Holly A. Ingraham, John L.R. Rubenstein, James P. Warne and Pierre Flandin and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Andrew A. Pierce

17 papers receiving 786 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew A. Pierce United States 12 248 190 142 136 126 17 792
Matei Bolborea United Kingdom 16 549 2.2× 181 1.0× 49 0.3× 181 1.3× 189 1.5× 19 898
Dana Wilson United Kingdom 11 401 1.6× 145 0.8× 76 0.5× 159 1.2× 97 0.8× 17 621
Anna C. Geraghty United States 10 104 0.4× 156 0.8× 62 0.4× 84 0.6× 171 1.4× 12 1.4k
Changjiu Zhao United States 21 130 0.5× 376 2.0× 71 0.5× 55 0.4× 187 1.5× 37 823
Sandrine M. Dupré United Kingdom 13 596 2.4× 135 0.7× 53 0.4× 189 1.4× 163 1.3× 14 875
Gisela Helfer United Kingdom 18 484 2.0× 68 0.4× 43 0.3× 251 1.8× 197 1.6× 23 907
Wataru Matsunaga Japan 20 135 0.5× 229 1.2× 28 0.2× 104 0.8× 285 2.3× 50 1.0k
Stephanie M. Correa United States 16 198 0.8× 110 0.6× 255 1.8× 143 1.1× 132 1.0× 27 852
Mourad Mekaouche France 17 136 0.5× 161 0.8× 66 0.5× 122 0.9× 69 0.5× 27 916
Lori L. Badura United States 15 319 1.3× 198 1.0× 69 0.5× 129 0.9× 152 1.2× 35 814

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew A. Pierce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew A. Pierce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew A. Pierce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew A. Pierce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew A. Pierce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew A. Pierce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew A. Pierce. The network helps show where Andrew A. Pierce may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew A. Pierce

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew A. Pierce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew A. Pierce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew A. Pierce. Andrew A. Pierce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Astarita, Jillian L., Shilpa Keerthivasan, Bushra Husain, et al.. (2021). The neutrophil protein CD177 is a novel PDPN receptor that regulates human cancer-associated fibroblast physiology. PLoS ONE. 16(12). e0260800–e0260800. 10 indexed citations
2.
Brendza, Robert P., Han Lin, Kimberly L. Stark, et al.. (2021). Genetic ablation of Gpnmb does not alter synuclein-related pathology. Neurobiology of Disease. 159. 105494–105494. 9 indexed citations
3.
Scales, Suzie J., Ann M. De Mazière, George Posthuma, et al.. (2020). Apolipoprotein L1-Specific Antibodies Detect Endogenous APOL1 inside the Endoplasmic Reticulum and on the Plasma Membrane of Podocytes. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 31(9). 2044–2064. 41 indexed citations
4.
Pierce, Andrew A., Caroline C. Duwaerts, Aras N. Mattis, et al.. (2017). CD18 deficiency improves liver injury in the MCD model of steatohepatitis. PLoS ONE. 12(9). e0183912–e0183912. 8 indexed citations
5.
Pierce, Andrew A., Caroline C. Duwaerts, James P. Grenert, et al.. (2015). Isocaloric manipulation of macronutrients within a high-carbohydrate/moderate-fat diet induces unique effects on hepatic lipogenesis, steatosis and liver injury. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. 29. 12–20. 16 indexed citations
6.
Pierce, Andrew A., et al.. (2015). Differential hepatotoxicity of dietary and DNL-derived palmitate in the methionine-choline-deficient model of steatohepatitis. BMC Gastroenterology. 15(1). 72–72. 18 indexed citations
7.
Correa, Stephanie M., David W. Newstrom, James P. Warne, et al.. (2014). An Estrogen-Responsive Module in the Ventromedial Hypothalamus Selectively Drives Sex-Specific Activity in Females. Cell Reports. 10(1). 62–74. 122 indexed citations
8.
Pierce, Andrew A. & Allison Xu. (2010). De Novo Neurogenesis in Adult Hypothalamus as a Compensatory Mechanism to Regulate Energy Balance. Journal of Neuroscience. 30(2). 723–730. 182 indexed citations
9.
Olofsson, Louise E., Andrew A. Pierce, & Allison Xu. (2009). Functional requirement of AgRP and NPY neurons in ovarian cycle-dependent regulation of food intake. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106(37). 15932–15937. 135 indexed citations
10.
Ferkin, Michael H., et al.. (2008). Gonadal hormones modulate sex differences in judgments of relative numerousness in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Hormones and Behavior. 55(1). 76–83. 6 indexed citations
11.
Ferkin, Michael H., et al.. (2007). Meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, have the capacity to recall the “what”, “where”, and “when” of a single past event. Animal Cognition. 11(1). 147–159. 76 indexed citations
12.
Pierce, Andrew A., et al.. (2007). Food Deprivation Suppresses a Preference for the Top‐Scent Mark of an Over‐Mark in Meadow Voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Ethology. 113(5). 480–486. 9 indexed citations
13.
Pierce, Andrew A., et al.. (2006). Food deprivation and the role of estradiol in mediating sexual behaviors in meadow voles. Physiology & Behavior. 90(2-3). 353–361. 17 indexed citations
14.
Ferkin, Michael H. & Andrew A. Pierce. (2006). Perspectives on over-marking: is it good to be on top?. Journal of Ethology. 25(2). 107–116. 51 indexed citations
15.
Pierce, Andrew A. & Michael H. Ferkin. (2005). Re-feeding and the restoration of odor attractivity, odor preference, and sexual receptivity in food-deprived female meadow voles. Physiology & Behavior. 84(4). 553–561. 19 indexed citations
16.
Pierce, Andrew A., et al.. (2005). Food-deprivation-induced changes in sexual behaviour of meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Animal Behaviour. 70(2). 339–348. 36 indexed citations
17.
Ferkin, Michael H., et al.. (2004). Meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, can distinguish more over-marks from fewer over-marks. Animal Cognition. 8(3). 182–189. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026