Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas Hepp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas Hepp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas Hepp more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas Hepp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas Hepp. The network helps show where Andreas Hepp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andreas Hepp
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andreas Hepp.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andreas Hepp based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andreas Hepp. Andreas Hepp is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hepp, Andreas, Nick Couldry, Göran Bolin, Julia Velkova, & Benedetta Brevini. (2025). CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON COMMUNICATIVE AI. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research.1 indexed citations
2.
Hepp, Andreas, et al.. (2024). Agency in a datafied society: an introduction. Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 30(3). 945–955.2 indexed citations
Hepp, Andreas, Andreas Breiter, & Thomas N. Friemel. (2018). Digital Traces in Context| Digital Traces in Context — An Introduction. International journal of communication. 12. 11.2 indexed citations
8.
Gerhard, Ulrike & Andreas Hepp. (2018). Digital Traces in Context| Appropriating Digital Traces of Self-Quantification: Contextualizing Pragmatic and Enthusiast Self-Trackers. International journal of communication. 12. 18.3 indexed citations
9.
Hepp, Andreas, Andreas Breiter, & Thomas N. Friemel. (2018). Digital Traces in Context. Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich).11 indexed citations
10.
Hepp, Andreas & Uwe Hasebrink. (2015). Interação Humana e Configurações Comunicativas: transformações culturais e sociedades midiatizadas. Americanae (AECID Library). 3(2). 75–90.2 indexed citations
Hepp, Andreas & Friedrich Krotz. (2014). Mediatized worlds : culture and society in a media age. Palgrave Macmillan eBooks.69 indexed citations
13.
Bird, S. Elizabeth, Nick Couldry, Andreas Hepp, et al.. (2014). Participations| Part 4: KNOWLEDGE AND EDUCATION. International journal of communication. 8. 27.2 indexed citations
14.
Bird, S. Elizabeth, Nick Couldry, Andreas Hepp, et al.. (2014). Participations: Dialogues on the Participatory Promise of Contemporary Culture and Politics Part 4: Knowledge and Education. Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida). 8. 1216–1242.1 indexed citations
15.
Hepp, Andreas & Friedrich Krotz. (2014). Mediatized Worlds. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks.57 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.