Andrea Lamont
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Abraham WandersmanJonathan ScacciaBrittany S. CookM. Lee Van HornJ. Sylvan KatzRinad S. BeidasPatrick S. MaloneThomas Jaki
- Topics
- Health Policy Implementation Science (14 papers)Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (5 papers)Evaluation and Performance Assessment (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Andrea Lamont
36 papers receiving 736 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- General Health Professions 283
- Clinical Psychology 126
- Statistics and Probability 82
- Cognitive Neuroscience 80
- Epidemiology 80
Countries citing papers authored by Andrea Lamont
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrea Lamont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrea Lamont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrea Lamont more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrea Lamont
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrea Lamont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrea Lamont. The network helps show where Andrea Lamont may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrea Lamont
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrea Lamont. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrea Lamont based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrea Lamont. Andrea Lamont is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | Usability of Movement-To-Music Technology for Children With Physical Disabilities | 0 |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 49 | |
| 18 | 39 | |
| 19 | 34 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Andrea Lamont
Andrea Lamont is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, General Health Professions and Occupational Therapy, having authored 40 papers that have together received 773 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (14 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (5 papers) and Evaluation and Performance Assessment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (283 citations), Statistics and Probability (82 citations) and Applied Psychology (37 citations). Andrea Lamont has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Abraham Wandersman, Jonathan Scaccia, Brittany S. Cook, M. Lee Van Horn, J. Sylvan Katz, Rinad S. Beidas, Patrick S. Malone, Thomas Jaki, Daniel J. Feaster and Katherine E. Masyn. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.