Anamara Ritt‐Olson

3.6k citations
55 papers · 2.8k indexed · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Anamara Ritt‐Olson

51 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Anamara Ritt‐Olson
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Clinical Psychology 1.2k
  • Applied Psychology 257
  • Health 261
  • General Health Professions 648
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.0k
Replace Daniel W. Soto with:
Daniel W. Soto United States
Margaretha de Looze Netherlands
Miguel Ángel Cano United States
Jemekia Thornton United States
Robert L. Flewelling United States
Barbara Queen United States
Zewditu Demissie United States
José P. Espada Spain
Chris G. Richardson Canada
Mary Ellen O’Connell United States
Anamara Ritt‐Olson relative to Daniel W. Soto United States Daniel W. Soto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Daniel W. Soto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anamara Ritt‐Olson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anamara Ritt‐Olson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anamara Ritt‐Olson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anamara Ritt‐Olson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anamara Ritt‐Olson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anamara Ritt‐Olson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anamara Ritt‐Olson. The network helps show where Anamara Ritt‐Olson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anamara Ritt‐Olson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anamara Ritt‐Olson Line = papers co-authored together Anamara Ritt‐Olson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20232
2 20223
3 20225
4 20216
5 202121
6 20210
7 20214
8 201926
9 201814
10 201814
11 201718
12 200925
13 2007184
14 2007105
15 200756
16 200795
17 200681
18 200533
19 200368
20 200058

About Anamara Ritt‐Olson

Anamara Ritt‐Olson is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Safety Research, having authored 55 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (17 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (13 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (12 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (12 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (11 papers), Family Support in Illness (11 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (9 papers) and Youth Development and Social Support (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations), Applied Psychology (257 citations), Health (261 citations), General Health Professions (648 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.0k citations). Anamara Ritt‐Olson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer B. Unger, Daniel W. Soto, Lourdes Báezconde‐Garbanati, Joel Milam, Paula H. Palmer, Steve Sussman, Peggy Gallaher, C. Anderson Johnson, Karla D. Wagner and Elma I. Lorenzo‐Blanco. Their work appears in journals such as Substance Use & Misuse, Journal of Adolescent Health, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology and Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026