Anabel González‐Acedo
- Co-authors
- Lucía Melguizo‐RodríguezVictoria García‐MoralesTeresa Pardo-MorenoJuan José Ramos‐RodríguezVíctor J. Costela‐RuizAntonio Rivas-DomínguezFrancisco Garcı́a-CózarJavier Ramos‐Torrecillas
- Topics
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers)Edible Oils Quality and Analysis (3 papers)Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainPolandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Anabel González‐Acedo
15 papers receiving 378 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Physiology 107
- Pharmacology 84
- Molecular Biology 83
- Pollution 70
- Biomedical Engineering 36
Countries citing papers authored by Anabel González‐Acedo
This map shows the geographic impact of Anabel González‐Acedo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anabel González‐Acedo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anabel González‐Acedo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anabel González‐Acedo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anabel González‐Acedo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anabel González‐Acedo. The network helps show where Anabel González‐Acedo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anabel González‐Acedo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anabel González‐Acedo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anabel González‐Acedo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anabel González‐Acedo. Anabel González‐Acedo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | Therapeutic Approach to Alzheimer’s Disease: Current Treatments and New Perspectivesbreakdown → | 140 |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 72 | |
| 18 | 62 |
About Anabel González‐Acedo
Anabel González‐Acedo is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Neurology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Edible Oils Quality and Analysis (3 papers) and Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (22 citations), Pollution (70 citations) and Pharmacology (84 citations). Anabel González‐Acedo has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Poland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lucía Melguizo‐Rodríguez, Victoria García‐Morales, Teresa Pardo-Moreno, Juan José Ramos‐Rodríguez, Víctor J. Costela‐Ruiz, Antonio Rivas-Domínguez, Francisco Garcı́a-Cózar, Javier Ramos‐Torrecillas, Rebeca Illescas‐Montes and Enrique García‐Recio. Their work appears in journals such as Chemosphere, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Nutrients.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.