Ana Torres

1.0k citations
38 papers · 358 indexed · h-index 11

Ana Torres

33 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers

Ana Torres
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 17
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 95
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 47
  • Demography 34
  • Clinical Psychology 54
Replace Paweł Izdebski with:
Paweł Izdebski Poland
Evelyn Barron United Kingdom
Marta Torres Spain
Andrea Wilkinson Canada
Laurel Young Australia
Andrew D. Palmer United States
Shin Ah Kim South Korea
Stefania M. Mojon‐Azzi Switzerland
Mili Parikh United States
Ana Torres relative to Paweł Izdebski Poland Paweł Izdebski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Paweł Izdebski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ana Torres

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Torres's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Torres with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Torres more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Torres

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Torres. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Torres. The network helps show where Ana Torres may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ana Torres, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ana Torres Line = papers co-authored together Ana Torres links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20240
3 20231
4 20239
5 202321
6 20230
7 20222
8 20210
9 20201
10 201912
11 20162
12
Estudo de validade da versão portuguesa do questionário de formas delidar com o cancro.
20140
13
A utilização das TIC e o autoconceito, o ânimo e a qualidade de vida do cidadão sénior: que relação?
20141
14 201417
15 201322
16 20111
17
Videojogos: um novo meio de entretenimento de idosos?
20081
18 20055
19 2000100
20 198821

About Ana Torres

Ana Torres is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Genetics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Demography and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 38 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (8 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (7 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (6 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Family Support in Illness (5 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (4 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (3 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (17 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (95 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (47 citations), Demography (34 citations) and Clinical Psychology (54 citations). Ana Torres has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Leonard A. Jason, Renée R. Taylor, Anabela Pereira, Sara Monteiro›, Nelson Zagalo, Ana Isabel Veloso, Ana Bártolo, Isabel M. Santos, Sylvain Aldighieri and Lionel Gresh. Their work appears in journals such as European Psychiatry, BMJ Open, The Visual Computer, BMC Psychology and Psychological Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026