Ana Bártolo

1.1k citations
50 papers · 657 indexed · h-index 14

Ana Bártolo

40 papers receiving 630 citations

Peers

Ana Bártolo
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Clinical Psychology 205
  • Occupational Therapy 40
  • Business and International Management 17
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 48
  • Applied Psychology 34
Replace Marta Evelia Aparicio García with:
Marta Evelia Aparicio García Spain
Anne Bergen Canada
Schuyler W. Henderson United States
Sara Monteiro› Portugal
Jutta Viinikainen Finland
Johanna Graf Germany
JoAnn Prause United States
Sara Santini Italy
Lana van Niekerk South Africa
A Giorgi Italy
Ana Bártolo relative to Marta Evelia Aparicio García Spain Marta Evelia Aparicio García's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Marta Evelia Aparicio García · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ana Bártolo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Bártolo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Bártolo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Bártolo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Bártolo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Bártolo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Bártolo. The network helps show where Ana Bártolo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ana Bártolo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ana Bártolo Line = papers co-authored together Ana Bártolo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20252
3 20250
4 20240
5 20241
6 20240
7 20233
8 20230
9 20233
10 20233
11 20229
12 20214
13 202018
14 20203
15 20208
16 2020114
17 20206
18 201812
19 20180
20 201611

About Ana Bártolo

Ana Bártolo is a scholar working on Business and International Management, Clinical Psychology, Reproductive Medicine, Nephrology and Occupational Therapy, having authored 50 papers that have together received 657 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Support in Illness (11 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (9 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (7 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (5 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (5 papers), Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (5 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (4 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (205 citations), Occupational Therapy (40 citations), Business and International Management (17 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (48 citations) and Applied Psychology (34 citations). Ana Bártolo has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Anabela Pereira, Sara Monteiro›, Jacinto Jardim, Carlos Fernandes da Silva, António Marques, Cristina Queirós, Fernando C. Passos, Isabel M. Santos, Paula Vagos and Elisabete Valério. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Disability and Rehabilitation, European Psychiatry, Psycho-Oncology and The Prison Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026