Ana Sofía Vaz
- Ecological Modeling top 2%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 19
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 9
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services 23
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 6
- Forest Management and Policy 5
- Ecology top 5%
-
- Urban Green Space and Health 5
-
- Animal and Plant Science Education 8
-
- Plant and animal studies 6
Ana Sofía Vaz
54 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Ecological Modeling 285
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 372
- Global and Planetary Change 565
- Ecology 513
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 232
Countries citing papers authored by Ana Sofía Vaz
This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Sofía Vaz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Sofía Vaz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Sofía Vaz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Sofía Vaz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Sofía Vaz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Sofía Vaz. The network helps show where Ana Sofía Vaz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ana Sofía Vaz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 15 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 71 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 109 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 19 | Sustentabilidade da apanha de isco para pesca nos ecossistemas estuarinos: Caso de estudo na Reserva Natural Local do Estuário do Douro, Portugal | 2013 | 1 |
| 20 | 2013 | 4 |
About Ana Sofía Vaz
Ana Sofía Vaz is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Insect Science, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Land Use and Ecosystem Services (23 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (19 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (8 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (5 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (285 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (372 citations), Global and Planetary Change (565 citations), Ecology (513 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (232 citations). Ana Sofía Vaz has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include João P. Honrado, Joana R. Vicente, Christoph Kueffer, David M. Richardson, Christian A. Kull, Domingo Alcaraz‐Segura, Ingolf Kühn, Aletta Bonn, Matthias Schröter and Jennifer Hauck. Their work appears in journals such as Ecosystem Services, The Science of The Total Environment, Journal of Environmental Management, Nature Conservation and Landscape and Urban Planning.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.