Countries where authors publish in Nature Conservation
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature Conservation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature Conservation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature Conservation more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature Conservation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature Conservation.
About Nature Conservation
The 463 papers published in Nature Conservation in the last decades have received a total of 5.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Nature Conservation usually cover Ecological Modeling (83 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (116 papers), Ecology (238 papers), Global and Planetary Change (124 papers) and Insect Science (65 papers) specifically the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (133 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (83 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (78 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (51 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (49 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (48 papers), Plant and animal studies (37 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature Conservation are Douglas Evans, Neil D’Cruze, James Fitzsimons, David W. Macdonald, Dirk S. Schmeller, Tiemo Kahl, Jürgen Bauhus, Klaus Henle, Damian Chmura and Audrey Trochet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.