Nature Conservation

428 papers and 4.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 428 papers published in Nature Conservation in the last decades have received a total of 4.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Nature Conservation usually cover Ecology (226 papers), Global and Planetary Change (123 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (108 papers) specifically the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (128 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (79 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature Conservation are Douglas Evans, Neil D’Cruze, James Fitzsimons, David W. Macdonald, Dirk S. Schmeller, Jürgen Bauhus, Tiemo Kahl, Klaus Henle, Audrey Trochet and Damian Chmura.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nature Conservation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature Conservation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature Conservation.

Countries where authors publish in Nature Conservation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature Conservation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature Conservation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature Conservation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025