Ana M. Palomar
- Infectious Diseases top 1%
- Parasitology top 0.2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Insect Science top 2%
- Co-authors
- José A. OteoAránzazu PortilloSonia SantibáñezPaula SantibáñezLara García-ÁlvarezDavid MazuelasLesley Bell‐SakyiCristina Cervera‐Acedo
- Topics
- Vector-borne infectious diseases (50 papers)Viral Infections and Vectors (41 papers)Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (18 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEEmerging infectious diseases
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Ana M. Palomar
58 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Infectious Diseases 1.2k
- Parasitology 1.2k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 636
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 346
- Insect Science 293
Countries citing papers authored by Ana M. Palomar
This map shows the geographic impact of Ana M. Palomar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana M. Palomar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana M. Palomar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ana M. Palomar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana M. Palomar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana M. Palomar. The network helps show where Ana M. Palomar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ana M. Palomar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ana M. Palomar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ana M. Palomar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ana M. Palomar. Ana M. Palomar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 62 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 41 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 142 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 58 | |
| 16 | 104 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | Tolerancia y eficacia de la tobramicina tópica vs cloranfenicol en el tratamiento de las conjunctivitis bacterianas | 1 |
About Ana M. Palomar
Ana M. Palomar is a scholar working on Parasitology, Infectious Diseases and Insect Science, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vector-borne infectious diseases (50 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (41 papers) and Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (1.2k citations), Infectious Diseases (1.2k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (636 citations). Ana M. Palomar has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include José A. Oteo, Aránzazu Portillo, Sonia Santibáñez, Paula Santibáñez, Lara García-Álvarez, David Mazuelas, Lesley Bell‐Sakyi, Cristina Cervera‐Acedo, Ignacio Ruiz‐Arrondo and Juan F. Cuadrado. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Emerging infectious diseases.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.