Ana M. Chicas‐Mosier
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Insect Science top 10%
- Plant Science
- Genetics
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Co-authors
- Charles I. AbramsonAmy M. IlerKailen A. MooneyWilliam K. PetryTom E. X. MillerDavid W. InouyeSarah C. FankhauserRobert H. Tai
- Topics
- Insect and Pesticide Research (12 papers)Plant and animal studies (9 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (6 papers)
- Journals
- SciencePLoS ONEAnimal Behaviour
- Partner nations
- United StatesPuerto RicoTürkiye
In The Last Decade
Ana M. Chicas‐Mosier
15 papers receiving 288 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 128
- Insect Science 92
- Plant Science 75
- Genetics 64
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 41
Countries citing papers authored by Ana M. Chicas‐Mosier
This map shows the geographic impact of Ana M. Chicas‐Mosier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana M. Chicas‐Mosier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana M. Chicas‐Mosier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ana M. Chicas‐Mosier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana M. Chicas‐Mosier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana M. Chicas‐Mosier. The network helps show where Ana M. Chicas‐Mosier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ana M. Chicas‐Mosier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ana M. Chicas‐Mosier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ana M. Chicas‐Mosier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ana M. Chicas‐Mosier. Ana M. Chicas‐Mosier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | An Examination of the Use of Large Language Models to Aid Analysis of Textual Databreakdown → | 53 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 55 | |
| 16 | 76 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 7 |
About Ana M. Chicas‐Mosier
Ana M. Chicas‐Mosier is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and General Social Sciences, having authored 19 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (12 papers), Plant and animal studies (9 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (92 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (128 citations) and Health Informatics (7 citations). Ana M. Chicas‐Mosier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Charles I. Abramson, Amy M. Iler, Kailen A. Mooney, William K. Petry, Tom E. X. Miller, David W. Inouye, Sarah C. Fankhauser, Robert H. Tai, Seyed Hossein Goldansaz and Khalil Talebi. Their work appears in journals such as Science, PLoS ONE and Animal Behaviour.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.