An de Decker

435 total citations
9 papers, 334 citations indexed

About

An de Decker is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, An de Decker has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 334 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Clinical Psychology, 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in An de Decker's work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (4 papers) and Identity, Memory, and Therapy (4 papers). An de Decker is often cited by papers focused on Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (4 papers) and Identity, Memory, and Therapy (4 papers). An de Decker collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Netherlands. An de Decker's co-authors include Filip Raes, Paul Eelen, Dirk Hermans, James Williams, Steven De Peuter, J. Mark G. Williams, Geert Molenberghs, Liesbeth Bruckers, Peer van der Helm and Marc D. Binder and has published in prestigious journals such as Emotion, Depression and Anxiety and Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology.

In The Last Decade

An de Decker

8 papers receiving 316 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
An de Decker Belgium 6 266 169 109 97 89 9 334
Kathie Halbach Moffitt United States 5 266 1.0× 151 0.9× 74 0.7× 78 0.8× 112 1.3× 8 351
Tuğba Uzer Türkiye 8 200 0.8× 178 1.1× 80 0.7× 65 0.7× 46 0.5× 18 311
Malene Klindt Bohni Denmark 3 154 0.6× 154 0.9× 266 2.4× 78 0.8× 32 0.4× 3 398
Tyron Woolfe United Kingdom 6 346 1.3× 101 0.6× 39 0.4× 80 0.8× 19 0.2× 6 385
Belinda Graham United Kingdom 9 70 0.3× 59 0.3× 227 2.1× 73 0.8× 55 0.6× 14 330
Kelly A. Durbin United States 9 71 0.3× 179 1.1× 58 0.5× 80 0.8× 17 0.2× 12 293
Laureen O’Hanlon United States 6 240 0.9× 74 0.4× 95 0.9× 35 0.4× 22 0.2× 8 305
Octávio Moura Portugal 10 154 0.6× 76 0.4× 56 0.5× 48 0.5× 24 0.3× 27 303
Katharine K. Shobe United States 4 76 0.3× 151 0.9× 135 1.2× 55 0.6× 11 0.1× 6 273
Brenda Y. Terrell United States 9 325 1.2× 189 1.1× 82 0.8× 39 0.4× 14 0.2× 11 438

Countries citing papers authored by An de Decker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of An de Decker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by An de Decker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites An de Decker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by An de Decker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by An de Decker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by An de Decker. The network helps show where An de Decker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of An de Decker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of An de Decker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of An de Decker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with An de Decker. An de Decker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Decker, An de, et al.. (2022). Systematic Aggression Registration in Forensic Psychiatric Care: A Qualitative Study on Preconditions for Successful Implementation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 68(6-7). 657–676. 1 indexed citations
2.
Vogel, Viviënne de, et al.. (2022). Women admitted to forensic psychiatry in Flanders (Belgium): who are they?. Journal of Forensic Practice. 24(2). 184–198. 1 indexed citations
3.
Decker, An de, et al.. (2017). The Relation Between Aggression and the Living Group Climate in a Forensic Treatment Unit for Adolescents: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 62(7). 1821–1837. 14 indexed citations
4.
Danckaerts, Marina, Liesbeth Bruckers, Geert Molenberghs, et al.. (2014). Registration of aggressive incidents in an adolescent forensic psychiatric unit and implications for further practice. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 23(9). 823–833. 5 indexed citations
5.
Hermans, Dirk, An de Decker, Steven De Peuter, et al.. (2007). Autobiographical memory specificity and affect regulation: coping with a negative life event. Depression and Anxiety. 25(9). 787–792. 56 indexed citations
6.
Raes, Filip, Dirk Hermans, An de Decker, Paul Eelen, & James Williams. (2003). Autobiographical memory specificity and affect regulation: An experimental approach.. Emotion. 3(2). 201–206. 149 indexed citations
7.
Decker, An de, Dirk Hermans, Filip Raes, & Paul Eelen. (2003). Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Trauma in Inpatient Adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. 32(1). 22–31. 99 indexed citations
8.
Decker, An de, Dirk Hermans, Filip Raes, & Paul Eelen. (2003). Autobiographical Memory Specificity and Trauma in Inpatient Adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. 32(1). 22–31. 8 indexed citations
9.
Decker, An de, Dirk Hermans, & Paul Eelen. (2000). Veralgemeende herinneringen bij mensen met emotionele problemen. 33(2). 101–124. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026