Amy Slater

9.0k total citations · 4 hit papers
86 papers, 6.1k citations indexed

About

Amy Slater is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Marketing. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy Slater has authored 86 papers receiving a total of 6.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 68 papers in Clinical Psychology, 25 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 19 papers in Marketing. Recurrent topics in Amy Slater's work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (67 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (23 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (17 papers). Amy Slater is often cited by papers focused on Eating Disorders and Behaviors (67 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (23 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (17 papers). Amy Slater collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Amy Slater's co-authors include Marika Tiggemann, Toby Newton‐John, Rachel Cohen, Hannah K. Jarman, Siân A. McLean, Susan J. Paxton, Jasmine Fardouly, Nadia Corsini, Phillippa C. Diedrichs and Rebecca K. Golley and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Kidney International.

In The Last Decade

Amy Slater

84 papers receiving 5.8k citations

Hit Papers

NetGirls: The Internet, Facebook, and body image concern ... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 2017 2019 2019 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amy Slater Australia 42 4.0k 1.7k 1.1k 1.0k 982 86 6.1k
Rachel F. Rodgers United States 47 6.6k 1.7× 2.0k 1.2× 887 0.8× 1.6k 1.6× 551 0.6× 276 8.3k
Jasmine Fardouly Australia 29 3.6k 0.9× 1.8k 1.1× 742 0.7× 302 0.3× 438 0.4× 61 5.0k
Emma Halliwell United Kingdom 38 3.0k 0.8× 833 0.5× 850 0.8× 438 0.4× 650 0.7× 60 4.0k
Sarah K. Murnen United States 32 3.4k 0.8× 902 0.5× 886 0.8× 599 0.6× 1.9k 1.9× 49 5.0k
Tracy L. Tylka United States 55 10.1k 2.5× 1.0k 0.6× 1.5k 1.4× 2.0k 1.9× 1.3k 1.3× 121 11.8k
Tomi-Ann Roberts United States 5 3.1k 0.8× 823 0.5× 784 0.7× 266 0.3× 1.6k 1.6× 5 4.4k
Rachel M. Calogero United States 39 2.9k 0.7× 639 0.4× 489 0.4× 636 0.6× 816 0.8× 79 4.1k
Diane Carlson Jones United States 26 2.1k 0.5× 453 0.3× 370 0.3× 383 0.4× 289 0.3× 56 3.3k
Stephanie A. Shields United States 30 1.3k 0.3× 1.4k 0.8× 240 0.2× 241 0.2× 1.2k 1.3× 74 4.5k
Ann Frisén Sweden 29 1.5k 0.4× 966 0.6× 187 0.2× 191 0.2× 275 0.3× 78 3.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Slater

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Slater's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Slater with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Slater more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Slater

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Slater. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Slater. The network helps show where Amy Slater may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy Slater

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy Slater. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy Slater based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy Slater. Amy Slater is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
3.
Williamson, Heidi, et al.. (2021). Children’s attitudes and friendship behaviors toward socially stigmatized appearances: Do attitudes vary according to type of difference?. Stigma and Health. 6(3). 344–353. 2 indexed citations
4.
Jarman, Hannah K., Siân A. McLean, Amy Slater, Mathew D. Marques, & Susan J. Paxton. (2021). Direct and indirect relationships between social media use and body satisfaction: A prospective study among adolescent boys and girls. New Media & Society. 26(1). 292–312. 32 indexed citations
5.
Jarman, Hannah K., Amy Slater, Siân A. McLean, Mathew D. Marques, & Susan J. Paxton. (2021). The impact of completing body image assessments on adolescents’ body image and engagement in body change strategies: Harmful or harmless?. Body Image. 39. 131–138. 4 indexed citations
6.
McLean, Siân A., Rachel F. Rodgers, Amy Slater, et al.. (2021). Clinically significant body dissatisfaction: prevalence and association with depressive symptoms in adolescent boys and girls. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 31(12). 1921–1932. 48 indexed citations
7.
Rodgers, Rachel F., Amy Slater, Chloe S. Gordon, et al.. (2020). A Biopsychosocial Model of Social Media Use and Body Image Concerns, Disordered Eating, and Muscle-Building Behaviors among Adolescent Girls and Boys. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 49(2). 399–409. 177 indexed citations
8.
Bornioli, Anna, Helena Lewis‐Smith, Amy Slater, & Isabelle Bray. (2020). Body dissatisfaction predicts the onset of depression among adolescent females and males: a prospective study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 75(4). 343–348. 90 indexed citations
9.
10.
Slater, Amy, Natasha Cole, & Jasmine Fardouly. (2019). The effect of exposure to parodies of thin-ideal images on young women’s body image and mood. Body Image. 29. 82–89. 64 indexed citations
11.
Halliwell, Emma, Hannah K. Jarman, Tracy L. Tylka, & Amy Slater. (2017). Adapting the Body Appreciation Scale-2 for Children: A psychometric analysis of the BAS-2C. Body Image. 21. 97–102. 48 indexed citations
12.
Cohen, Rachel, Toby Newton‐John, & Amy Slater. (2017). The relationship between Facebook and Instagram appearance-focused activities and body image concerns in young women. Body Image. 23. 183–187. 251 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Prichard, Ivanka, et al.. (2016). Exposure to Barbie: Effects on thin-ideal internalisation, body esteem, and body dissatisfaction among young girls. Body Image. 19. 142–149. 35 indexed citations
14.
15.
Slater, Amy, et al.. (2011). Just One Click: A Content Analysis of Advertisements on Teen Web Sites. Journal of Adolescent Health. 50(4). 339–345. 47 indexed citations
17.
Slater, Amy & Marika Tiggemann. (2006). The Contribution of Physical Activity and Media Use during Childhood and Adolescence to Adult Women's Body Image. Journal of Health Psychology. 11(4). 553–565. 49 indexed citations
18.
Tiggemann, Marika & Amy Slater. (2003). Thin ideals in music television: A source of social comparison and body dissatisfaction. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 35(1). 48–58. 212 indexed citations
19.
Levine, David Z., Michelle Iacovitti, Kevin D. Burns, & Amy Slater. (2000). Distal tubule bicarbonate reabsorption in intact and remnant diabetic kidneys. Kidney International. 57(2). 544–549. 7 indexed citations
20.
Tiggemann, Marika, Maria Gardiner, & Amy Slater. (2000). “I would rather be size 10 than have straight A's”: A focus group study of adolescent girls' wish to be thinner. Journal of Adolescence. 23(6). 645–659. 121 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026