Toby Newton‐John
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Marketing top 5%
- Co-authors
- Rachel CohenAmy SlaterLauren IrwinJasmine FardoulyJoanna M. ZakrzewskaJustin DurhamSusan H. SpenceAmanda C de C Williams
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (34 papers)Pain Management and Placebo Effect (13 papers)Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Toby Newton‐John
83 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Clinical Psychology 1.1k
- Sociology and Political Science 488
- Pharmacology 438
- Psychiatry and Mental health 297
- Marketing 265
Countries citing papers authored by Toby Newton‐John
This map shows the geographic impact of Toby Newton‐John's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Toby Newton‐John with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toby Newton‐John more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Toby Newton‐John
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Toby Newton‐John. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Toby Newton‐John. The network helps show where Toby Newton‐John may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Toby Newton‐John
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Toby Newton‐John. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Toby Newton‐John based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Toby Newton‐John. Toby Newton‐John is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 98 | |
| 19 | Assessment and Management of Orofacial Pain | 19 |
| 20 | Chronic idiopathic orofacial pain: 1: What is the evidence base? | 1 |
About Toby Newton‐John
Toby Newton‐John is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Applied Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 92 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (34 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (13 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and Manual Therapy (142 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations) and Marketing (265 citations). Toby Newton‐John has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Cohen, Amy Slater, Lauren Irwin, Jasmine Fardouly, Joanna M. Zakrzewska, Justin Durham, Susan H. Spence, Amanda C de C Williams, Milton L. Wainberg and David E. Schotte. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Pain and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.