Amy L. Busch
About
In The Last Decade
Amy L. Busch
7 papers receiving 688 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Health 518
- Clinical Psychology 415
- Sociology and Political Science 324
- Social Psychology 178
- General Health Professions 132
Countries citing papers authored by Amy L. Busch
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy L. Busch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy L. Busch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy L. Busch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy L. Busch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy L. Busch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy L. Busch. The network helps show where Amy L. Busch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy L. Busch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy L. Busch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy L. Busch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy L. Busch. Amy L. Busch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 41 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 47 | |
| 6 | 86 | |
| 7 | The Intergenerational Transmission of Spouse Abuse: A Meta‐Analysis breakdown → | 512 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.