Amy Cooter
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Face Recognition and Perception
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Papers in
-
- Race, History, and American Society 2
- Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice 1
-
- Face Recognition and Perception 2
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 2
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 1
- Co-authors
- David H. Zald (3 shared papers)Stephen D. Smith (1 shared paper)Steven B. Most (1 shared paper)David A. Lishner (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cognition & Emotion (2 papers)Sociological Inquiry (1 paper)Journal of Nonverbal Behavior (1 paper)Scientific American (1 paper)Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Amy Cooter
7 papers receiving 291 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Cognitive Neuroscience 164
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 93
- Applied Psychology 27
- General Decision Sciences 10
- Sensory Systems 22
Countries citing papers authored by Amy Cooter
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Cooter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Cooter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Cooter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Cooter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Cooter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Cooter. The network helps show where Amy Cooter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Amy Cooter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 173 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 5 | Americanness, Masculinity, and Whiteness: How Michigan Militia Men Navigate Evolving Social Norms. | 2013 | 7 |
| 6 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 0 |
About Amy Cooter
Amy Cooter is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology and Cultural Studies, having authored 8 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (1 paper), American Political and Social Dynamics (1 paper), Color perception and design (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and Gender Roles and Identity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (164 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (93 citations), Applied Psychology (27 citations), General Decision Sciences (10 citations) and Sensory Systems (22 citations). Amy Cooter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David H. Zald, Stephen D. Smith, Steven B. Most and David A. Lishner. Their work appears in journals such as Cognition & Emotion, Sociological Inquiry, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, Scientific American and Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.