Steven B. Most

3.7k total citations
69 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Steven B. Most is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Steven B. Most has authored 69 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 59 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 21 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 8 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Steven B. Most's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (53 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (26 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (12 papers). Steven B. Most is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (53 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (26 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (12 papers). Steven B. Most collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Steven B. Most's co-authors include Daniel J. Simons, Brian J. Scholl, David H. Zald, Marvin M. Chun, Briana L. Kennedy, David M Widders, Stephen D. Smith, Christopher F. Chabris, Rachel Jimenez and Lingling Wang and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Molecular Biology and NeuroImage.

In The Last Decade

Steven B. Most

61 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Steven B. Most United States 25 1.9k 783 387 220 173 69 2.5k
Ulrich Ansorge Austria 32 2.7k 1.4× 765 1.0× 697 1.8× 178 0.8× 226 1.3× 183 3.2k
Jan W. de Fockert United Kingdom 21 2.6k 1.4× 997 1.3× 536 1.4× 122 0.6× 90 0.5× 44 3.3k
Robert D. Melara United States 30 1.9k 1.0× 1.2k 1.6× 448 1.2× 176 0.8× 126 0.7× 78 2.7k
Daniël Schreij Netherlands 8 1.5k 0.8× 666 0.9× 375 1.0× 106 0.5× 132 0.8× 15 2.2k
Alison Harris United States 19 2.1k 1.1× 636 0.8× 235 0.6× 165 0.8× 126 0.7× 32 2.6k
Alexandre Schaefer United Kingdom 24 1.4k 0.7× 878 1.1× 471 1.2× 291 1.3× 86 0.5× 51 2.2k
Nicholas Gaspelin United States 23 2.7k 1.4× 649 0.8× 316 0.8× 88 0.4× 216 1.2× 51 2.9k
Jun‐ichiro Kawahara Japan 24 1.6k 0.8× 526 0.7× 204 0.5× 129 0.6× 125 0.7× 134 2.0k
Laura Miccoli Spain 9 891 0.5× 596 0.8× 399 1.0× 198 0.9× 198 1.1× 14 1.6k
Francisco Mercado Spain 16 1.8k 0.9× 807 1.0× 489 1.3× 181 0.8× 116 0.7× 49 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Steven B. Most

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven B. Most's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven B. Most with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven B. Most more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven B. Most

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven B. Most. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven B. Most. The network helps show where Steven B. Most may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven B. Most

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven B. Most. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven B. Most based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven B. Most. Steven B. Most is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Moeck, Ella K., et al.. (2023). Emotional stimuli similarly disrupt attention in both visual fields. Cognition & Emotion. 37(4). 633–649. 1 indexed citations
2.
Onie, Sandersan, Colin MacLeod, & Steven B. Most. (2022). Gone for good: Lack of priming suggests early perceptual interference in emotion-induced blindness with negative stimuli.. Emotion. 23(7). 1869–1875. 2 indexed citations
3.
Pelley, Mike E. Le, et al.. (2022). Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 84(5). 1446–1459. 11 indexed citations
4.
Most, Steven B., et al.. (2021). Out of fright, out of mind: impaired memory for information negated during looming threat. Cognitive Research Principles and Implications. 6(1). 36–36. 3 indexed citations
5.
Onie, Sandersan, Mary A. Peterson, Mike E. Le Pelley, & Steven B. Most. (2020). Learned value and predictiveness affect gaze but not figure assignment. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 83(1). 156–172. 1 indexed citations
6.
Watson, Poppy, Daniel Pearson, Jan Theeuwes, Steven B. Most, & Mike E. Le Pelley. (2019). Delayed disengagement of attention from distractors signalling reward. Cognition. 195. 104125–104125. 27 indexed citations
7.
Watson, Poppy, Daniel Pearson, Steven B. Most, et al.. (2019). Attentional capture by Pavlovian reward-signalling distractors in visual search persists when rewards are removed. PLoS ONE. 14(12). e0226284–e0226284. 30 indexed citations
8.
Watson, Poppy, Daniel Pearson, Jan Theeuwes, et al.. (2019). Capture and Control: Working Memory Modulates Attentional Capture by Reward-Related Stimuli. Psychological Science. 30(8). 1174–1185. 24 indexed citations
9.
Kimonis, Eva R., et al.. (2019). An elusive deficit: Psychopathic personality traits and aberrant attention to emotional stimuli.. Emotion. 20(6). 951–964. 10 indexed citations
10.
11.
Pelley, Mike E. Le, et al.. (2018). Winners and losers: Reward and punishment produce biases in temporal selection.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 45(5). 822–833. 19 indexed citations
12.
Most, Steven B., et al.. (2018). Manipulations of distractor frequency do not mitigate emotion-induced blindness. Cognition & Emotion. 33(3). 442–451. 8 indexed citations
13.
Kennedy, Briana L. & Steven B. Most. (2013). The role of distractors' categorical distinctiveness in emotion-induced blindness. Journal of Vision. 13(9). 1135–1135.
14.
Most, Steven B., Steffen Boettcher, & James E. Hoffman. (2013). The Role of Feature Salience in Emotion-induced Blindness. Journal of Vision. 13(9). 904–904.
15.
Most, Steven B., et al.. (2012). Response monitoring and cognitive control in childhood obesity. Biological Psychology. 92(2). 199–204. 17 indexed citations
16.
Kennedy, Briana L. & Steven B. Most. (2011). Emotion-induced blindness elicits no lag-1 sparing. Journal of Vision. 11(11). 111–111.
17.
Most, Steven B., et al.. (2011). Prior perceptual decisions drive subsequent perceptual experience: Negative priming increases inattentional blindness. Journal of Vision. 11(11). 159–159. 3 indexed citations
18.
Most, Steven B., et al.. (2010). Blind jealousy? Romantic insecurity increases emotion-induced failures of visual perception.. Emotion. 10(2). 250–256. 13 indexed citations
19.
Most, Steven B., Marvin M. Chun, Matthew R. Johnson, & Kent A. Kiehl. (2006). Attentional modulation of the amygdala varies with personality. NeuroImage. 31(2). 934–944. 102 indexed citations
20.
Most, Steven B., et al.. (2005). Affect and the resolution of cognitive control dilemmas. Journal of Molecular Biology. 427(8). 1715–27. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ulrich Ansorge Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jan W. de Fockert Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert D. Melara Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniël Schreij Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alison Harris Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alexandre Schaefer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nicholas Gaspelin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jun‐ichiro Kawahara Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Laura Miccoli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Francisco Mercado
Rankless by CCL
2026