Amina Tariq

78 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Amina Tariq
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Health Informatics 60
  • Health Information Management 177
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 91
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 29
  • Family Practice 32
Replace Yang Gong with:
Yang Gong United States
Clair Sullivan Australia
Joshua E. Richardson United States
Andrew Staib Australia
Mahnaz Samadbeik Iran
Gunnar Nilsson Sweden
Ronen Rozenblum United States
Luís Velez Lapão Portugal
Farhad Fatehi Australia
Chris Paton United Kingdom
Amina Tariq relative to Yang Gong United States Yang Gong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Yang Gong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amina Tariq

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amina Tariq's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amina Tariq with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amina Tariq more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amina Tariq

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amina Tariq. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amina Tariq. The network helps show where Amina Tariq may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amina Tariq, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amina Tariq Line = papers co-authored together Amina Tariq links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201981
2 202080
3 202368
4 201654
5 202343
6 201238
7 201935
8 202033
9 201232
10 202232
11 201731
12 202030
13 201630
14 201627
15 201922
16 201920
17 201820
18 202119
19 201716
20 202016

About Amina Tariq

Amina Tariq is a scholar working on Health Information Management, General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (20 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (10 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (9 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (8 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (6 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (5 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (5 papers) and Healthcare Quality and Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (60 citations), Health Information Management (177 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (91 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (29 citations) and Family Practice (32 citations). Amina Tariq has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Pakistan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Johanna Westbrook, Andrew Georgiou, Melissa Baysari, Shanchita R. Khan, Richard O. Day, Sumera Javad, Javed Iqbal, Óscar Oviedo-Trespalacios, Khurshid Ayub and Faisal Nawaz. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Medical Informatics, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Applied Clinical Informatics, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact