Amgad Droby
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Neurology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Frauke ZippVinzenz FleischerSergiu GroppaRalf DeichmannRené‐Maxime GracienJohannes KleinSarah C. ReitzAnat Mirelman
- Topics
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (22 papers)Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (19 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (13 papers)
- Cited by
- Pathology and Forensic MedicineRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingCognitive Neuroscience
- Journals
- PLoS ONENeuroImageNeurology
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
Amgad Droby
47 papers receiving 673 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 310
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 290
- Cognitive Neuroscience 184
- Neurology 140
- Molecular Biology 66
Countries citing papers authored by Amgad Droby
This map shows the geographic impact of Amgad Droby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amgad Droby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amgad Droby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amgad Droby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amgad Droby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amgad Droby. The network helps show where Amgad Droby may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amgad Droby
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amgad Droby. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amgad Droby based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amgad Droby. Amgad Droby is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 31 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About Amgad Droby
Amgad Droby is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Neurology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 677 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (22 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (19 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (290 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (310 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (184 citations). Amgad Droby has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Frauke Zipp, Vinzenz Fleischer, Sergiu Groppa, Ralf Deichmann, René‐Maxime Gracien, Johannes Klein, Sarah C. Reitz, Anat Mirelman, Helmuth Steinmetz and Muthuraman Muthuraman. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.