Amber Young

27 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers

Amber Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Sociology and Political Science 203
  • Communication 125
  • Information Systems 61
  • Management Information Systems 53
  • Political Science and International Relations 45
Replace Emily Treen with:
Emily Treen Canada
Devinder Thapa Norway
Annemette Kjærgaard Denmark
Colin Porlezza Switzerland
Maureen Tanner South Africa
Jillet Sarah Sam India
Emmanuel Monod France
Michael Kwet United States
Margaret Kling Australia
Jeria L. Quesenberry United States
Amber Young relative to Emily Treen Canada Emily Treen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Emily Treen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amber Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber Young. The network helps show where Amber Young may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber Young

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber Young. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber Young based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber Young. Amber Young is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 2
4 3
5 1
6 14
7 18
8
Giving Voice to the Voiceless: The Use of Digital Technologies by Marginalized Groups
24
9
Cyberactivism as Emancipatory Pedagogy: The Case of the Five Tribes Freedmen.
2
10 1
11 48
12
Theorizing Human and Bot Co-production Effects on Information Quality
5
13 1
14 45
15
It’s Not What You Think: Gender Bias in Information about Fortune 1000 CEOs on Wikipedia
5
16
Gamification and Brand Engagement on Facebook: An Exploratory Case Study
6
17 87
18 6
19
Cultural Production of Protest Frames and Tactics: Cybermediaries and the SOPA Movement
8
20
Communicating Necessary Evils: The Role of Expressive and Diffusive Capabilities
0

About Amber Young

Amber Young is a scholar working on Communication, Computer Science Applications and Information Systems and Management, having authored 30 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (9 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (5 papers) and Information Systems Theories and Implementation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (125 citations), Computer Science Applications (45 citations) and Business and International Management (15 citations). Amber Young has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Luxembourg. Frequent co-authors include Gerald C. Kane, Shaila M. Miranda, Ann Majchrzak, Sam Ransbotham, Lisen Selander, Emmanuelle Vaast, Hameed Chughtai, Michael Myers, Viswanath Venkatesh and Janis L. Gogan. Their work appears in journals such as MIS Quarterly, International Journal of Information Management and Journal of Management Information Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026