Simon Booth

20 papers receiving 402 citations

Peers

Simon Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Rehabilitation 196
  • Research and Theory 8
  • Occupational Therapy 30
  • Biomaterials 80
  • Microbiology 36
Replace Paul J. Renick with:
Paul J. Renick United States
Daniel Metcalf United Kingdom
Christopher Hoey United Kingdom
Sujata Sarabahi India
Angela Oates United Kingdom
Andrew Kingsley United Kingdom
Rajan C Gandhi India
Sohan P Selkar India
Haidy G. Rivero United States
Jennifer Hurlow United States
Simon Booth relative to Paul J. Renick United States Paul J. Renick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Paul J. Renick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Booth. The network helps show where Simon Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Simon Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon Booth Line = papers co-authored together Simon Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015117
2 201258
3 201844
4 202040
5 200933
6 200824
7 200322
8
Walk Backwards to Happiness : Debugging by Time Travel
199719
9 201416
10 202010
11
Laser Doppler velocity instrument
19689
12 20205
13 20194
14 20174
15 20113
16 20232
17 20182
18
Towards a purely functional debugger for functional programs
19952
19
Are Ours Really Smaller Than Theirs?
19962
20 20251

About Simon Booth

Simon Booth is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Epidemiology, Occupational Therapy, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 21 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (11 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (11 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (4 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (2 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (2 papers), Antimicrobial agents and applications (2 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (2 papers) and Organizational Learning and Leadership (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (196 citations), Research and Theory (8 citations), Occupational Therapy (30 citations), Biomaterials (80 citations) and Microbiology (36 citations). Simon Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include A. Toby A. Jenkins, Thet Naing, Baljit Dheansa, Amber Young, Jonathan Nzakizwanayo, Diana R. Alves, Brian V. Jones, Jessica Bean, Justin R. Sharpe and Nigel Jordan. Their work appears in journals such as Burns, Journal of Hospital Infection, BMJ Open, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology and Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact