Lisa K. Hanasono

612 total citations
24 papers, 400 citations indexed

About

Lisa K. Hanasono is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lisa K. Hanasono has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 400 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Social Psychology, 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Lisa K. Hanasono's work include Communication in Education and Healthcare (10 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (9 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers). Lisa K. Hanasono is often cited by papers focused on Communication in Education and Healthcare (10 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (9 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers). Lisa K. Hanasono collaborates with scholars based in United States, Russia and Australia. Lisa K. Hanasono's co-authors include Amanda J. Holmstrom, Brant R. Burleson, Jessica J. Rack, Graham D. Bodie, Lisa M. Guntzviller, Erina L. MacGeorge, Bo Feng, Margaret M. Yacobucci, Deborah A. O’Neil and Ellen M. Broido and has published in prestigious journals such as Sex Roles, Communication Research and Human Communication Research.

In The Last Decade

Lisa K. Hanasono

23 papers receiving 385 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lisa K. Hanasono United States 9 220 135 100 59 56 24 400
Sally O. Hastings United States 12 118 0.5× 144 1.1× 92 0.9× 40 0.7× 27 0.5× 32 338
Gina Castle Bell United States 10 119 0.5× 135 1.0× 56 0.6× 41 0.7× 47 0.8× 15 306
Jess K. Alberts United States 10 206 0.9× 296 2.2× 61 0.6× 49 0.8× 33 0.6× 15 536
Angela M. Hosek United States 10 211 1.0× 180 1.3× 77 0.8× 53 0.9× 146 2.6× 31 428
Katheryn C. Maguire United States 11 237 1.1× 219 1.6× 138 1.4× 63 1.1× 30 0.5× 25 515
John G. Wirtz United States 9 158 0.7× 143 1.1× 74 0.7× 50 0.8× 16 0.3× 12 419
Osamu Fukushima Japan 8 170 0.8× 211 1.6× 45 0.5× 69 1.2× 16 0.3× 15 354
Jan Alewyn Nel South Africa 14 294 1.3× 169 1.3× 209 2.1× 35 0.6× 41 0.7× 34 524
Betsy Wackernagel Bach United States 9 178 0.8× 173 1.3× 44 0.4× 59 1.0× 66 1.2× 17 448
Andrea M. Bodtker United States 9 154 0.7× 228 1.7× 43 0.4× 34 0.6× 22 0.4× 12 354

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa K. Hanasono

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa K. Hanasono's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa K. Hanasono with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa K. Hanasono more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa K. Hanasono

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa K. Hanasono. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa K. Hanasono. The network helps show where Lisa K. Hanasono may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa K. Hanasono

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa K. Hanasono. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa K. Hanasono based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa K. Hanasono. Lisa K. Hanasono is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hanasono, Lisa K., et al.. (2023). Academic Mothers Building Online Communities. 1 indexed citations
2.
Ro, Hyun Kyoung, Ellen M. Broido, Lisa K. Hanasono, et al.. (2023). Faculty allyship: Differences by gender, race, and rank at a single U.S. University. Gender Work and Organization. 31(3). 768–796. 1 indexed citations
3.
Hanasono, Lisa K., Hyun Kyoung Ro, Deborah A. O’Neil, et al.. (2022). Communicating privilege and faculty allyship. Communication Quarterly. 70(5). 560–584. 1 indexed citations
4.
Yang, Fan & Lisa K. Hanasono. (2021). Coping with Racial Discrimination with Collective Power: How Does Bonding and Bridging Social Capital Help Online and Offline?. Howard Journal of Communications. 32(3). 274–293. 4 indexed citations
5.
Hanasono, Lisa K., et al.. (2019). Diverging discourses: Examining how college students majoring in communication define diversity. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication. 20(1). 9–18. 13 indexed citations
6.
Hanasono, Lisa K., et al.. (2018). Secret service: Revealing gender biases in the visibility and value of faculty service.. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. 12(1). 85–98. 86 indexed citations
7.
Hanasono, Lisa K., et al.. (2017). Teaching students how to publish communication research. Communication Teacher. 33(2). 151–157. 3 indexed citations
8.
Hanasono, Lisa K.. (2017). A critical examination of communication textbooks. Communication Teacher. 32(1). 3–7.
9.
Hanasono, Lisa K.. (2016). Making a difference: A community-based campaign that promotes diversity and inclusion. Communication Teacher. 31(1). 27–34. 1 indexed citations
10.
Hanasono, Lisa K., Lanming Chen, & Steven R. Wilson. (2014). Identifying Communities in Need: Examining the Impact of Acculturation on Perceived Discrimination, Social Support, and Coping amongst Racial Minority Members in the United States. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication. 7(3). 216–237. 11 indexed citations
11.
Hanasono, Lisa K.. (2013). Virtual Voices with Real-Life Consequences: Teaching Students about Cyber-Vetting. Communication Teacher. 27(4). 191–197. 2 indexed citations
12.
MacGeorge, Erina L., Lisa M. Guntzviller, Lisa K. Hanasono, & Bo Feng. (2013). Testing Advice Response Theory in Interactions With Friends. Communication Research. 43(2). 211–231. 82 indexed citations
13.
Hanasono, Lisa K., et al.. (2012). A Dialectical Approach to Rethinking Roommate Relationships. Journal of college student development. 53(5). 623–635. 3 indexed citations
14.
Hanasono, Lisa K., et al.. (2011). Explaining Gender Differences in the Perception of Support Availability: The Mediating Effects of Construct Availability and Accessibility. Communication Research Reports. 28(3). 254–265. 7 indexed citations
15.
Burleson, Brant R., et al.. (2010). Testing a Dual-Process Theory of Supportive Communication Outcomes: How Source, Message, Contextual, and Recipient Factors Influence Outcomes in Support Situations. 2 indexed citations
16.
Bodie, Graham D., et al.. (2010). Explaining the Impact of Attachment Style on Evaluations of Supportive Messages: A Dual-Process Framework. Communication Research. 38(2). 228–247. 30 indexed citations
17.
Burleson, Brant R., et al.. (2009). Explaining Gender Differences in Responses to Supportive Messages: Two Tests of a Dual-Process Approach. Sex Roles. 61(3-4). 265–280. 35 indexed citations
18.
Burleson, Brant R., et al.. (2008). What Women Know and Feel about Social Support that Men Don't: Two Tests of a Dual-Process Approach to Explaining Sex Differences in Responses to Supportive Messages. 1–40. 1 indexed citations
19.
Burleson, Brant R., et al.. (2008). Its How You Think About It: Effects of Ability and Motivation on Recipient Processing of and Responses to Comforting Messages. 1–40. 3 indexed citations
20.
Burleson, Brant R., et al.. (2007). Good Grief: Testing a Dual-Process Model of Responses to Grief-Management Messages. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026