Amber L. Cushing

434 total citations
25 papers, 301 citations indexed

About

Amber L. Cushing is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Information Systems and Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Amber L. Cushing has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 301 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Information Systems and Management, 8 papers in Information Systems and 8 papers in Conservation. Recurrent topics in Amber L. Cushing's work include Digital and Traditional Archives Management (8 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (7 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (4 papers). Amber L. Cushing is often cited by papers focused on Digital and Traditional Archives Management (8 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (7 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (4 papers). Amber L. Cushing collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, United States and Canada. Amber L. Cushing's co-authors include Karl Gyllstrom, Diane Kelly, Benjamin R. Cowan, Xi Niu, Kalpana Shankar, Adam Kriesberg, Helen R. Tibbo, Elizabeth Yakel, Wendy Duff and R. Ferguson and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Documentation and Library & Information Science Research.

In The Last Decade

Amber L. Cushing

24 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amber L. Cushing Ireland 11 94 68 66 65 37 25 301
Junghwan Kim South Korea 6 61 0.6× 36 0.5× 108 1.6× 117 1.8× 37 1.0× 14 305
Teresa Dobson Canada 7 31 0.3× 104 1.5× 124 1.9× 28 0.4× 19 0.5× 32 358
Fabio Nascimbeni Spain 10 23 0.2× 161 2.4× 39 0.6× 12 0.2× 21 0.6× 36 646
Janghee Cho United States 7 29 0.3× 38 0.6× 101 1.5× 87 1.3× 49 1.3× 16 380
Ahlam Mohammed Al-Abdullatif Saudi Arabia 13 65 0.7× 108 1.6× 71 1.1× 10 0.2× 26 0.7× 25 419
Andreu Sulé Spain 3 20 0.2× 66 1.0× 42 0.6× 44 0.7× 11 0.3× 10 346
Ann Medaille United States 10 17 0.2× 102 1.5× 29 0.4× 12 0.2× 15 0.4× 23 302
Alexandra Totter Switzerland 6 33 0.4× 42 0.6× 51 0.8× 56 0.9× 50 1.4× 30 262
Mirjam Seckler Switzerland 5 90 1.0× 32 0.5× 143 2.2× 56 0.9× 79 2.1× 8 310
Jennefer Hart United Kingdom 9 71 0.8× 24 0.4× 149 2.3× 81 1.2× 22 0.6× 14 269

Countries citing papers authored by Amber L. Cushing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber L. Cushing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber L. Cushing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber L. Cushing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber L. Cushing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber L. Cushing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber L. Cushing. The network helps show where Amber L. Cushing may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber L. Cushing

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber L. Cushing. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber L. Cushing based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber L. Cushing. Amber L. Cushing is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cushing, Amber L.. (2023). PIM as a caring: Using ethics of care to explore personal information management as a caring process. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(11). 1282–1292. 8 indexed citations
2.
Cushing, Amber L., et al.. (2023). Investigating the Intersections of Ethics and Artificial Intelligence in the Collections as Data Position Papers. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 60(1). 1092–1095.
3.
Cushing, Amber L., et al.. (2022). Personal information management burden: A framework for describing nonwork personal information management in the context of inequality. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(11). 1543–1558. 11 indexed citations
4.
Cushing, Amber L., et al.. (2022). “So how do we balance all of these needs?”: how the concept of AI technology impacts digital archival expertise. Journal of Documentation. 79(7). 12–29. 19 indexed citations
5.
6.
Cushing, Amber L. & Kalpana Shankar. (2018). Digital curation on a small island: a study of professional education and training needs in Ireland. Archives and Records. 40(2). 146–163. 10 indexed citations
7.
Cushing, Amber L. & Benjamin R. Cowan. (2017). Walk1916. Journal of Documentation. 73(5). 917–933. 11 indexed citations
8.
Cushing, Amber L., et al.. (2017). ‘We have to make an effort with it’. IFLA Journal. 43(1). 40–50. 10 indexed citations
9.
Cushing, Amber L.. (2016). “If it computes, patrons have brought it in”: Personal information management and personal technology assistance in public libraries. Library & Information Science Research. 38(1). 81–88. 9 indexed citations
10.
Cushing, Amber L. & Benjamin R. Cowan. (2016). Walk1916: Exploring how a mobile walking tour app can provide value for LAMs. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 53(1). 1–5. 2 indexed citations
11.
Cushing, Amber L.. (2013). A Balance of Primary and Secondary Values: Exploring a Digital Legacy. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(2). 67–94. 12 indexed citations
12.
Cushing, Amber L.. (2013). “It's stuff that speaks to me”: Exploring the characteristics of digital possessions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(8). 1723–1734. 57 indexed citations
13.
Cushing, Amber L.. (2012). Exploring the potential for Q method in the study of personal information management. 1 indexed citations
14.
Yakel, Elizabeth, Wendy Duff, Helen R. Tibbo, Adam Kriesberg, & Amber L. Cushing. (2012). The Economic Impact of Archives: Surveys of Users of Government Archives in Canada and the United States. The American Archivist. 75(2). 297–325. 7 indexed citations
15.
Cushing, Amber L.. (2011). Self extension and the desire to preserve digital possessions. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 48(1). 1–3. 25 indexed citations
16.
Cushing, Amber L.. (2010). "I just want more information about who I am": the search experience of sperm-donor offspring, searching for information about their donors and genetic heritage. Information Research. 15(2). 1. 30 indexed citations
17.
Cushing, Amber L.. (2010). Highlighting the archives perspective in the personal digital archiving discussion. Library Hi Tech. 28(2). 301–312. 16 indexed citations
18.
Cushing, Amber L.. (2010). Career Satisfaction of Young Archivists: A Survey of Professional Working Archivists, Age 35 and Under. The American Archivist. 73(2). 600–625. 5 indexed citations
19.
Cushing, Amber L., et al.. (2010). Beyond everyday life: Information seeking behavior in deeply meaningful and profoundly personal contexts. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 47(1). 1–10. 19 indexed citations
20.
Cushing, Amber L.. (2009). Understanding interest to inform recruitment: What characteristics of digital curation interest computer science and computer engineering students?. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 46(1). 1–4. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Junghwan Kim Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Teresa Dobson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Fabio Nascimbeni Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Janghee Cho Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ahlam Mohammed Al-Abdullatif Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andreu Sulé Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ann Medaille Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alexandra Totter Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mirjam Seckler Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennefer Hart
Rankless by CCL
2026