Amanda Vickery
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Education top 5%
- History top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Co-authors
- Susan D. AmussenNoreen Naseem RodríguezCinthia SalinasMichael G. BrownMaría E. FránquizLaGarrett J. King
- Topics
- Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (15 papers)Critical Race Theory in Education (14 papers)Global Education and Multiculturalism (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Amanda Vickery
23 papers receiving 372 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Sociology and Political Science 290
- Education 231
- History 69
- Economics and Econometrics 67
- Literature and Literary Theory 27
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Vickery
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Vickery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Vickery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Vickery more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Vickery
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Vickery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Vickery. The network helps show where Amanda Vickery may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Vickery
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Vickery. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Vickery based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Vickery. Amanda Vickery is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | Pinning for Profit? Examining Elementary Preservice Teachers' Critical Analysis of Online Social Studies Resources about Black History. | 33 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | A Pathway to Racial Literacy: Using the LETS ACT Framework to Teach Controversial Issues. | 8 |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 68 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 40 | |
| 18 | Women, Privilege, and Power: British Politics, 1750 to the Present | 14 |
| 19 | 70 | |
| 20 | 36 |
About Amanda Vickery
Amanda Vickery is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Education and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (15 papers), Critical Race Theory in Education (14 papers) and Global Education and Multiculturalism (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (231 citations), History (69 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (290 citations). Amanda Vickery has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Susan D. Amussen, Noreen Naseem Rodríguez, Cinthia Salinas, Michael G. Brown, María E. Fránquiz and LaGarrett J. King. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Teaching and Teacher Education and Urban Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.