Amanda Smith

28.8k citations
35 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Amanda Smith

35 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Amanda Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Clinical Psychology 343
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 229
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 250
  • Rehabilitation 91
  • Health 100
Replace Kathleen P. Decker with:
Kathleen P. Decker United States
Catherine Coyle United States
Jerome Bickenbach Switzerland
Christel M. C. van Leeuwen Netherlands
Matthias Morfeld Germany
Claudio Peter Switzerland
Jennifer L. Caputo United States
Isabel Silva Portugal
Krystyna Jaracz Poland
Rui Quintas Italy
Amanda Smith relative to Kathleen P. Decker United States Kathleen P. Decker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Kathleen P. Decker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Smith. The network helps show where Amanda Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Smith Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006165
2 2014110
3 2015109
4 201074
5 201669
6 201453
7 201142
8 200442
9 201639
10 201339
11 199839
12 201334
13 201832
14 201224
15 201523
16 201522
17 201319
18 202019
19 201718
20 201516

About Amanda Smith

Amanda Smith is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (8 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (5 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (4 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (343 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (229 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (250 citations), Rehabilitation (91 citations) and Health (100 citations). Amanda Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ivan Molton, Mark P. Jensen, Dawn M. Ehde, Kenneth I. Pakenham, Divna Haslam, Dagmar Amtmann, Kevin N. Alschuler, Aimee M. Verrall, Alexandra L. Terrill and Arielle Silverman. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and health journal, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Journal of Health Psychology, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Rehabilitation Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact