Amanda M. Vondras

651 total citations
10 papers, 353 citations indexed

About

Amanda M. Vondras is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Food Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda M. Vondras has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 353 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Plant Science, 4 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Food Science. Recurrent topics in Amanda M. Vondras's work include Horticultural and Viticultural Research (7 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (3 papers) and Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (3 papers). Amanda M. Vondras is often cited by papers focused on Horticultural and Viticultural Research (7 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (3 papers) and Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (3 papers). Amanda M. Vondras collaborates with scholars based in United States and Italy. Amanda M. Vondras's co-authors include Dario Cantù, Andrea Minio, Rosa Figueroa‐Balderas, Mélanie Massonnet, Noé Cochetel, Barbara Blanco‐Ulate, Brandon S. Gaut, Yongfeng Zhou, Summaira Riaz and Jadran F. García and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Genome biology and Frontiers in Plant Science.

In The Last Decade

Amanda M. Vondras

9 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amanda M. Vondras United States 9 305 173 152 43 40 10 353
Noé Cochetel United States 13 444 1.5× 192 1.1× 145 1.0× 43 1.0× 23 0.6× 27 492
Lukasz Grzeskowiak Italy 5 331 1.1× 84 0.5× 184 1.2× 73 1.7× 110 2.8× 10 380
Serena Foria Italy 8 277 0.9× 73 0.4× 134 0.9× 22 0.5× 19 0.5× 12 284
Nathalie Luchaire France 7 287 0.9× 138 0.8× 149 1.0× 19 0.4× 19 0.5× 10 311
João L. Coito Portugal 14 369 1.2× 208 1.2× 137 0.9× 11 0.3× 17 0.4× 16 420
Didier Varès France 9 394 1.3× 81 0.5× 222 1.5× 30 0.7× 162 4.0× 17 419
José Díaz-Riquelme Spain 5 418 1.4× 319 1.8× 102 0.7× 16 0.4× 10 0.3× 5 454
Alice Fornasiero Italy 7 168 0.6× 77 0.4× 41 0.3× 64 1.5× 14 0.3× 11 216
N. Sahar Israel 13 483 1.6× 457 2.6× 62 0.4× 20 0.5× 9 0.2× 22 569
G. Alleweldt Germany 8 309 1.0× 128 0.7× 131 0.9× 7 0.2× 31 0.8× 46 339

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda M. Vondras

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda M. Vondras's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda M. Vondras with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda M. Vondras more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda M. Vondras

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda M. Vondras. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda M. Vondras. The network helps show where Amanda M. Vondras may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda M. Vondras

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda M. Vondras. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda M. Vondras based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda M. Vondras. Amanda M. Vondras is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Cochetel, Noé, et al.. (2025). Phased epigenomics and methylation inheritance in a historical Vitis vinifera hybrid. Genome biology. 26(1). 392–392.
2.
Minio, Andrea, Noé Cochetel, Amanda M. Vondras, Mélanie Massonnet, & Dario Cantù. (2022). Assembly of complete diploid-phased chromosomes from draft genome sequences. G3 Genes Genomes Genetics. 12(8). 22 indexed citations
3.
Massonnet, Mélanie, Amanda M. Vondras, Noé Cochetel, et al.. (2022). Haplotype-resolved powdery mildew resistance loci reveal the impact of heterozygous structural variation on NLR genes in Muscadinia rotundifolia. G3 Genes Genomes Genetics. 12(8). 8 indexed citations
4.
Cochetel, Noé, Andrea Minio, Mélanie Massonnet, et al.. (2021). Diploid chromosome-scale assembly of the Muscadinia rotundifolia genome supports chromosome fusion and disease resistance gene expansion during Vitis and Muscadinia divergence. G3 Genes Genomes Genetics. 11(4). 32 indexed citations
5.
Vondras, Amanda M., Larry Lerno, Mélanie Massonnet, et al.. (2021). Rootstock influences the effect of grapevine leafroll‐associated viruses on berry development and metabolism via abscisic acid signalling. Molecular Plant Pathology. 22(8). 984–1005. 14 indexed citations
6.
Massonnet, Mélanie, Noé Cochetel, Andrea Minio, et al.. (2020). The genetic basis of sex determination in grapes. Nature Communications. 11(1). 2902–2902. 118 indexed citations
7.
Minio, Andrea, Mélanie Massonnet, Rosa Figueroa‐Balderas, et al.. (2019). Iso-Seq Allows Genome-Independent Transcriptome Profiling of Grape Berry Development. G3 Genes Genomes Genetics. 9(3). 755–767. 64 indexed citations
8.
Vondras, Amanda M., Andrea Minio, Barbara Blanco‐Ulate, et al.. (2019). The genomic diversification of grapevine clones. BMC Genomics. 20(1). 972–972. 63 indexed citations
9.
Vondras, Amanda M., Mauro Commisso, Flavia Guzzo, & Laurent Deluc. (2017). Metabolite Profiling Reveals Developmental Inequalities in Pinot Noir Berry Tissues Late in Ripening. Frontiers in Plant Science. 8. 1108–1108. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026