Amanda M. Seed
- Developmental Biology top 0.5%
- Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior 9
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Primate Behavior and Ecology 24
-
- Child and Animal Learning Development 29
-
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction 10
-
- Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills 9
-
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms 8
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 4
-
- Language and cultural evolution 4
- Co-authors
- Nicola S. ClaytonNathan J. EmeryMichael TomaselloRichard W. ByrneJosep CallAuguste M. P. von BayernSabine TebbichKevin N. Laland
- Journals
- Nature (1 paper)SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2 papers)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyAustria
In The Last Decade
Amanda M. Seed
42 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Developmental Biology 514
- Social Psychology 1.4k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 641
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 759
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 268
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda M. Seed
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda M. Seed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda M. Seed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda M. Seed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda M. Seed
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda M. Seed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda M. Seed. The network helps show where Amanda M. Seed may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda M. Seed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 5 | Sensitivity to ostension is not sufficient for pedagogical reasoning by toddlers. | 2020 | 1 |
| 6 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 8 | Saber sin saber: la cognición implícita y las mentes de niños pequeños y animales | 2017 | 1 |
| 9 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 15 | Primate Cognitionbreakdown → | 2010 | 479 |
| 16 | 2010 | 156 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 83 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 126 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 126 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 72 |
About Amanda M. Seed
Amanda M. Seed is a scholar working on Developmental Biology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (29 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (24 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (10 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (9 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (9 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (8 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers) and Language and cultural evolution (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (514 citations), Social Psychology (1.4k citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (641 citations). Amanda M. Seed has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Nicola S. Clayton, Nathan J. Emery, Michael Tomasello, Richard W. Byrne, Josep Call, Auguste M. P. von Bayern, Sabine Tebbich, Kevin N. Laland, Christoph J. Völter and Katie E. Slocombe. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.