Amanda M. Seed

4.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
45 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Amanda M. Seed is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda M. Seed has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 26 papers in Social Psychology and 11 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Amanda M. Seed's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (29 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (24 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (10 papers). Amanda M. Seed is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (29 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (24 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (10 papers). Amanda M. Seed collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Austria. Amanda M. Seed's co-authors include Nicola S. Clayton, Nathan J. Emery, Michael Tomasello, Richard W. Byrne, Josep Call, Auguste M. P. von Bayern, Sabine Tebbich, Kevin N. Laland, Christoph J. Völter and Katie E. Slocombe and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Amanda M. Seed

42 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

Primate Cognition 2010 2026 2015 2020 2010 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amanda M. Seed United Kingdom 18 1.4k 759 641 514 372 45 2.0k
Alex H. Taylor New Zealand 25 1.1k 0.8× 635 0.8× 476 0.7× 442 0.9× 289 0.8× 88 1.9k
Gavin R. Hunt New Zealand 25 1.7k 1.2× 916 1.2× 588 0.9× 890 1.7× 390 1.0× 49 2.4k
Federica Amici Germany 22 1.1k 0.8× 515 0.7× 355 0.6× 347 0.7× 239 0.6× 95 1.6k
Lydia M. Hopper United States 28 1.7k 1.2× 454 0.6× 716 1.1× 418 0.8× 356 1.0× 80 2.4k
Thibaud Gruber Switzerland 24 988 0.7× 346 0.5× 405 0.6× 541 1.1× 633 1.7× 59 1.9k
Catherine Hobaiter United Kingdom 25 1.7k 1.2× 449 0.6× 985 1.5× 1.2k 2.3× 187 0.5× 89 2.4k
Anne E. Russon Canada 20 1.5k 1.1× 300 0.4× 942 1.5× 393 0.8× 391 1.1× 49 2.3k
Jackie Chappell United Kingdom 22 877 0.6× 479 0.6× 540 0.8× 356 0.7× 335 0.9× 39 1.5k
Alison Jolly United Kingdom 21 1.4k 1.0× 784 1.0× 591 0.9× 524 1.0× 247 0.7× 51 2.7k
Linda F. Marchant United States 23 2.1k 1.5× 534 0.7× 759 1.2× 579 1.1× 1.3k 3.4× 52 2.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda M. Seed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda M. Seed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda M. Seed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda M. Seed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda M. Seed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda M. Seed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda M. Seed. The network helps show where Amanda M. Seed may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda M. Seed

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda M. Seed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda M. Seed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda M. Seed. Amanda M. Seed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Völter, Christoph J., et al.. (2022). Evidence for abstract representations in children but not capuchin monkeys. Cognitive Psychology. 140. 101530–101530. 1 indexed citations
3.
Völter, Christoph J., et al.. (2022). Exploring the development of attentional set shifting in young children with a novel Intradimensional/Extradimensional shift task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 221. 105428–105428. 3 indexed citations
4.
Völter, Christoph J., et al.. (2022). The structure of executive functions in preschool children and chimpanzees. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 6456–6456. 10 indexed citations
5.
Seed, Amanda M., et al.. (2020). Sensitivity to ostension is not sufficient for pedagogical reasoning by toddlers.. Cognitive Science. 1 indexed citations
6.
Slocombe, Katie E. & Amanda M. Seed. (2019). Cooperation in children. Current Biology. 29(11). R470–R473. 6 indexed citations
7.
Ainge, James A., et al.. (2018). The Role of Association in Pre-schoolers’ Solutions to “Spoon Tests” of Future Planning. Current Biology. 28(14). 2309–2313.e2. 22 indexed citations
8.
Ball, Derek, et al.. (2017). Saber sin saber: la cognición implícita y las mentes de niños pequeños y animales. 38(1). 49–62. 1 indexed citations
9.
Gómez, Juan Carlos, et al.. (2017). Knowing without knowing: implicit cognition and the minds of infants and animals / Saber sin saber: la cognición implícita y las mentes de niños pequeños y animales. Studies in Psychology Estudios de Psicología. 38(1). 37–62. 9 indexed citations
10.
Lambert, Megan L., et al.. (2016). Diffusion of novel foraging behaviour in Amazon parrots through social learning. Animal Cognition. 20(2). 285–298. 11 indexed citations
11.
Sebastián‐Enesco, Carla, et al.. (2015). Comparing humans and nonhuman great apes in the broken cloth problem: Is their knowledge causal or perceptual?. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 139. 174–189. 4 indexed citations
12.
Seed, Amanda M. & Josep Call. (2014). Space or physics? Children use physical reasoning to solve the trap problem from 2.5 years of age.. Developmental Psychology. 50(7). 1951–1962. 13 indexed citations
13.
Call, Josep, et al.. (2014). Abstract Knowledge in the Broken-String Problem: Evidence from Nonhuman Primates and Pre-Schoolers. PLoS ONE. 9(10). e108597–e108597. 15 indexed citations
14.
Seed, Amanda M., et al.. (2013). Animal Cognition: An End to Insight?. Current Biology. 23(2). R67–R69. 18 indexed citations
15.
Seed, Amanda M. & Michael Tomasello. (2010). Primate Cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science. 2(3). 407–419. 479 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Seed, Amanda M. & Richard W. Byrne. (2010). Animal Tool-Use. Current Biology. 20(23). R1032–R1039. 156 indexed citations
17.
Seed, Amanda M., Josep Call, Nathan J. Emery, & Nicola S. Clayton. (2009). Chimpanzees solve the trap problem when the confound of tool-use is removed.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes. 35(1). 23–34. 83 indexed citations
18.
Seed, Amanda M., Nicola S. Clayton, & Nathan J. Emery. (2007). Postconflict Third-Party Affiliation in Rooks, Corvus frugilegus. Current Biology. 17(2). 152–158. 126 indexed citations
19.
Seed, Amanda M., Sabine Tebbich, Nathan J. Emery, & Nicola S. Clayton. (2006). Investigating Physical Cognition in Rooks, Corvus frugilegus. Current Biology. 16(7). 697–701. 126 indexed citations
20.
Tebbich, Sabine, Amanda M. Seed, Nathan J. Emery, & Nicola S. Clayton. (2006). Non-tool-using rooks, Corvus frugilegus, solve the trap-tube problem. Animal Cognition. 10(2). 225–231. 72 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026