Amanda M. Amacker

450 citations
8 papers · 341 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
    • Gender, Security, and Conflict
  • Health top 10%
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence

Papers in

Amanda M. Amacker

8 papers receiving 321 citations

Peers

Amanda M. Amacker
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Gender Studies 141
  • Health 68
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 29
  • Clinical Psychology 66
  • Sociology and Political Science 130
Replace Analia F. Albuja with:
Analia F. Albuja United States
December Maxwell United States
Irene Bevc Canada
Mai-Han Trinh United States
Ana Cláudia Bortolozzi Maia Brazil
Kristin E. Silver United States
Colleen M. Ray United States
Penny Jameson United States
Inge van Nistelrooij Netherlands
D. R. Gina Sissoko United States
Amanda M. Amacker relative to Analia F. Albuja United States Analia F. Albuja's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.3×
Analia F. Albuja · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda M. Amacker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda M. Amacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda M. Amacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda M. Amacker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda M. Amacker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda M. Amacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda M. Amacker. The network helps show where Amanda M. Amacker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Amanda M. Amacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda M. Amacker Line = papers co-authored together Amanda M. Amacker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2010114
2 201178
3 201050
4 201337
5 200820
6 201315
7 201114
8 201313

About Amanda M. Amacker

Amanda M. Amacker is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers), Gender, Security, and Conflict (2 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (141 citations), Health (68 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (29 citations), Clinical Psychology (66 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (130 citations). Amanda M. Amacker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Audrey K. Miller, Heather Littleton, Christine A. Gidycz, Robert J. Cramer, Amber L. Paukert, Jeremy W. Pettit, Matt R. Nobles, Keith D. Markman and Tasha A. Menaker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Sex Roles, Violence Against Women, Psychology of Women Quarterly and Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact