Inge van Nistelrooij

452 citations
24 papers · 223 indexed · h-index 9
Topics
Ethics in medical practice (8 papers)Reproductive Health and Technologies (6 papers)Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (5 papers)
Journals
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEReproductive BioMedicine Online

In The Last Decade

Inge van Nistelrooij

19 papers receiving 216 citations

Peers

Inge van Nistelrooij
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • General Health Professions 86
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 73
  • Clinical Psychology 63
  • Sociology and Political Science 43
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 31
Replace Meridith Burles with:
Meridith Burles Canada
Jeremy Dixon United Kingdom
Jane Russo Brazil
Betty Glenn Harris United States
Vittorio Cigoli Italy
Jessica K. Perrotte United States
Clarissa Cortland United States
Barbara A. Gawinski United States
Ewa Kupcewicz Poland
Heather Gridley Australia
Inge van Nistelrooij relative to Meridith Burles Canada Meridith Burles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Meridith Burles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inge van Nistelrooij

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inge van Nistelrooij's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge van Nistelrooij with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge van Nistelrooij more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inge van Nistelrooij

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge van Nistelrooij. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge van Nistelrooij. The network helps show where Inge van Nistelrooij may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inge van Nistelrooij

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inge van Nistelrooij. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inge van Nistelrooij based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inge van Nistelrooij. Inge van Nistelrooij is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 6
3 3
4 3
5 0
6 0
7 3
8 0
9 0
10 1
11 13
12 1
13 1
14 11
15 38
16 10
17 44
18 42
19 10
20 7

About Inge van Nistelrooij

Inge van Nistelrooij is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 223 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (8 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (6 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (8 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (29 citations) and General Health Professions (86 citations). Inge van Nistelrooij has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Merel Visse, Carlo Leget, Linus Vanlaere, Vivienne Bozalek, V.E. Baur, A. Janneke B.M. Maas, Astrid Indekeu, Sophie H. Bolt, Alistair Niemeijer and Deborah Fox. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Reproductive BioMedicine Online.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026