Amanda Folsom

936 total citations · 1 hit paper
47 papers, 370 citations indexed

About

Amanda Folsom is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda Folsom has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 370 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Algebra and Number Theory, 25 papers in Mathematical Physics and 20 papers in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics. Recurrent topics in Amanda Folsom's work include Advanced Mathematical Identities (40 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (26 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Geometry (23 papers). Amanda Folsom is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Mathematical Identities (40 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (26 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Geometry (23 papers). Amanda Folsom collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Amanda Folsom's co-authors include Ken Ono, Kathrin Bringmann, Robert C. Rhoades, Larry Rolen, Karl Mahlburg, Cristina Ballantine, Matilde Laĺın, Jun Hwan Ryu, J. M. Corbett and Jennifer S. Balakrishnan and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications.

In The Last Decade

Amanda Folsom

38 papers receiving 347 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Harmonic Maass Forms and Mock Modular Forms: Theory and Applications

2017 75 citations Kathrin Bringmann, Amanda Folsom et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amanda Folsom United States	11	326	198	146	133	28	47	370
Robert C. Rhoades United States	12	380 1.2×	221 1.1×	189 1.3×	109 0.8×	53 1.9×	33	447
Nils-Peter Skoruppa Germany	9	185 0.6×	287 1.4×	65 0.4×	214 1.6×	12 0.4×	23	324
Akihiko Gyoja Japan	10	131 0.4×	214 1.1×	130 0.9×	224 1.7×	21 0.8×	35	285
Eric T. Mortenson Russia	10	404 1.2×	65 0.3×	224 1.5×	58 0.4×	85 3.0×	26	427
Roelof W. Bruggeman Netherlands	9	222 0.7×	216 1.1×	88 0.6×	84 0.6×	23 0.8×	39	282
Karl Mahlburg United States	11	264 0.8×	70 0.4×	211 1.4×	51 0.4×	33 1.2×	32	305
James Cogdell United States	13	227 0.7×	453 2.3×	165 1.1×	324 2.4×	30 1.1×	32	477
Minking Eie Taiwan	11	257 0.8×	40 0.2×	191 1.3×	47 0.4×	50 1.8×	51	315
Brooks Roberts United States	9	80 0.2×	249 1.3×	90 0.6×	229 1.7×	29 1.0×	12	271
I. Grojnowski United States	6	153 0.5×	251 1.3×	81 0.6×	329 2.5×	10 0.4×	8	351

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Folsom

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Folsom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Folsom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Folsom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Folsom

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Folsom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Folsom. The network helps show where Amanda Folsom may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Folsom

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Folsom. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Folsom based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Folsom. Amanda Folsom is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Folsom, Amanda, et al.. (2019). Advice for the Campus Interview. Notices of the American Mathematical Society. 66(10). 1652–1654. 1 indexed citations

2.

Balakrishnan, Jennifer S., et al.. (2019). Research Directions in Number Theory. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 3 indexed citations

3.

Folsom, Amanda. (2019). Asymptotics and Ramanujan's mock theta functions: then and now. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. 378(2163). 20180448–20180448.

4.

Corbett, J. M., et al.. (2018). Universal mock theta functions as quantum Jacobi forms. Research in the Mathematical Sciences. 6(1). 4 indexed citations

5.

Folsom, Amanda, et al.. (2017). Quantum Jacobi forms and balanced unimodal sequences. Journal of Number Theory. 186. 16–34. 5 indexed citations

6.

Folsom, Amanda. (2017). Perspectives on mock modular forms. Journal of Number Theory. 176. 500–540. 2 indexed citations

7.

Bringmann, Kathrin, Amanda Folsom, Ken Ono, & Larry Rolen. (2017). Harmonic Maass Forms and Mock Modular Forms: Theory and Applications. 75 indexed citations breakdown →

8.

Folsom, Amanda, et al.. (2016). “Strange” combinatorial quantum modular forms. Journal of Number Theory. 170. 315–346. 10 indexed citations

9.

Folsom, Amanda, et al.. (2016). On a general class of non-squashing partitions. Discrete Mathematics. 339(5). 1482–1506. 2 indexed citations

10.

Folsom, Amanda. (2016). Mock and mixed mock modular forms in the lower half-plane. Archiv der Mathematik. 107(5). 487–498.

11.

Folsom, Amanda & Paul M. Jenkins. (2016). Zeros of modular forms of half integral weight. Research in Number Theory. 2(1).

12.

Folsom, Amanda, Winfried Kohnen, & Sinai Robins. (2015). Cone theta functions and spherical polytopes with rational volumes. Annales de l’institut Fourier. 65(3). 1133–1151. 1 indexed citations

13.

Folsom, Amanda. (2014). Mock modular forms and d -distinct partitions. Advances in Mathematics. 254. 682–705. 2 indexed citations

14.

Folsom, Amanda, Ken Ono, & Robert C. Rhoades. (2013). MOCK THETA FUNCTIONS AND QUANTUM MODULAR FORMS. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1. 34 indexed citations

15.

Bringmann, Kathrin & Amanda Folsom. (2012). On a conjecture of B. Berndt and B. Kim. The Ramanujan Journal. 32(1). 1–4. 2 indexed citations

16.

Folsom, Amanda, et al.. (2011). ℓ-Adic properties of the partition function. Advances in Mathematics. 229(3). 1586–1609. 10 indexed citations

17.

Folsom, Amanda. (2009). Class invariants and cyclotomic unit groups from special values of modular units. Journal de Théorie des Nombres de Bordeaux. 20(2). 289–325. 2 indexed citations

18.

Folsom, Amanda. (2008). A short proof of the Mock Theta Conjectures using Maass forms. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 136(12). 4143–4149. 6 indexed citations

19.

Duke, William & Amanda Folsom. (2006). Modular units. 2 indexed citations

20.

Folsom, Amanda. (2005). Modular forms and Eisenstein's continued fractions. Journal of Number Theory. 117(2). 279–291. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact