Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Alvin E. Roth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alvin E. Roth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alvin E. Roth more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alvin E. Roth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alvin E. Roth. The network helps show where Alvin E. Roth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alvin E. Roth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alvin E. Roth.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alvin E. Roth based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alvin E. Roth. Alvin E. Roth is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Abdulkadiroğlu, Atila, Yeon‐Koo Che, Parag A. Pathak, Alvin E. Roth, & Olivier Tercieux. (2017). Minimizing Justified Envy in School Choice: The Design of New Orleans' OneApp. National Bureau of Economic Research.2 indexed citations
8.
Roth, Alvin E., J. Keith Murnighan, & Françoise Schoumaker. (2016). The Deadline Effect in Bargaining: Some Experimental Evidence. American Economic Review. 78(4). 806–823.39 indexed citations
9.
Niederle, Muriel & Alvin E. Roth. (2014). Philanthropically Funded Heroism Awards for Kidney Donors. Law and Contemporary Problems. 77(3). 131–144.6 indexed citations
Ünver, M. Utku, Tayfun Sönmez, & Alvin E. Roth. (2009). Efficient Kidney Exchange: Coincidence of Wants in a Markets with Compatibility-Based Preferences. Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University).234 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Niederle, Muriel & Alvin E. Roth. (2003). Unraveling Reduces Mobility in a Labor Market: Gastroenterology with and without a Centralized Match. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
Asker, John, et al.. (2002). Teaching auction strategy using experiments administered via the Internet. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).6 indexed citations
Roth, Alvin E. & Xiaolin Xing. (1994). Jumping the Gun: Imperfections and Institutions Related to the Timing of Market Transactions. American Economic Review. 84(4). 992–1044.227 indexed citations
18.
Roth, Alvin E., et al.. (1991). Sorority Rush as a Two-Sided Matching Mechanism. American Economic Review. 81(3). 441–464.93 indexed citations
19.
Roth, Alvin E., Kalyan Chatterjee, Robert Wilson, et al.. (1985). Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining. Cambridge University Press eBooks.307 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Roth, Alvin E. & Françoise Schoumaker. (1983). Expectations and Reputations in Bargaining: An Experimental Study. American Economic Review. 73(3). 362–372.93 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.