Alison M. Radcliffe

1.1k citations
9 papers · 766 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 6
Topics
Mental Health via Writing (4 papers)Identity, Memory, and Therapy (3 papers)Counseling Practices and Supervision (2 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Alison M. Radcliffe

9 papers receiving 738 citations

Hit Papers

Pain and emotion: a biopsychosocial review of recent rese...20112026201620212011100200300400500

Peers

Alison M. Radcliffe
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Pharmacology 286
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 260
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 177
  • Clinical Psychology 171
  • Social Psychology 130
Replace Kim E. Dixon with:
Kim E. Dixon United States
Yoni K. Ashar United States
Linda M. Dougherty United States
Catarina Tomé‐Pires Spain
C. Gagnon United States
Przemysław Bąbel Poland
Michael E. Robinson United States
Charles P. McCreary United States
Fredric M. Levine United States
Elizabeth J. Richardson United States
Alison M. Radcliffe relative to Kim E. Dixon United States Kim E. Dixon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Kim E. Dixon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alison M. Radcliffe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison M. Radcliffe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison M. Radcliffe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison M. Radcliffe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison M. Radcliffe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison M. Radcliffe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison M. Radcliffe. The network helps show where Alison M. Radcliffe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alison M. Radcliffe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alison M. Radcliffe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alison M. Radcliffe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alison M. Radcliffe. Alison M. Radcliffe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 4
2 23
3
Pain and emotion: a biopsychosocial review of recent researchbreakdown →
568
4 2
5 25
6 3
7 36
8 46
9 59

About Alison M. Radcliffe

Alison M. Radcliffe is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 766 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health via Writing (4 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (3 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (260 citations), Pharmacology (286 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (177 citations). Alison M. Radcliffe has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Lumley, Jay L. Cohen, Francis J. Keefe, Annmarie Caño, George S. Borszcz, Howard Schubiner, Laura S. Porter, Debbie Green, Aaron M. Luebbe and Tamora A. Callands. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Journal of Clinical Psychology and Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026