Jay L. Cohen
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Co-authors
- Todd LucasMason G. HaberBoris B. BaltesMark A. LumleyAlison M. RadcliffeFrancis J. KeefeGeorge S. BorszczAnnmarie Caño
- Topics
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (6 papers)Nail Diseases and Treatments (5 papers)Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Jay L. Cohen
26 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Clinical Psychology 491
- Social Psychology 376
- Pharmacology 330
- Psychiatry and Mental health 292
- General Health Professions 242
Countries citing papers authored by Jay L. Cohen
This map shows the geographic impact of Jay L. Cohen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay L. Cohen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay L. Cohen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jay L. Cohen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay L. Cohen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay L. Cohen. The network helps show where Jay L. Cohen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jay L. Cohen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jay L. Cohen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jay L. Cohen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jay L. Cohen. Jay L. Cohen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | Pain and emotion: a biopsychosocial review of recent researchbreakdown → | 568 |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 61 | |
| 9 | 34 | |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | The relationship between self‐reported received and perceived social support: A meta‐analytic reviewbreakdown → | 601 |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | Open-label study of the safety and efficacy of Fungoid tincture in patients with distal subungual onychomycosis of the toes. | 9 |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | Children's awareness of their bodily appearance: a developmental study of factors associated with the body percept. | 11 |
About Jay L. Cohen
Jay L. Cohen is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Social Psychology and Dermatology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (6 papers), Nail Diseases and Treatments (5 papers) and Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (205 citations), Clinical Psychology (491 citations) and Applied Psychology (114 citations). Jay L. Cohen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Todd Lucas, Mason G. Haber, Boris B. Baltes, Mark A. Lumley, Alison M. Radcliffe, Francis J. Keefe, George S. Borszcz, Annmarie Caño, Howard Schubiner and Laura S. Porter. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.