Alison M. Harman
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Co-authors
- L.D. BeazleyR.V. HoskinsPaul McGreevyStephen MooreGlen JefferySarah A. DunlopPatricia A. FlemingJohn H. Hogben
- Topics
- Retinal Development and Disorders (33 papers)Glaucoma and retinal disorders (13 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Comparative NeurologyPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesNeuroscience
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomMexico
In The Last Decade
Alison M. Harman
47 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Molecular Biology 630
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 405
- Ophthalmology 392
- Cognitive Neuroscience 214
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 144
Countries citing papers authored by Alison M. Harman
This map shows the geographic impact of Alison M. Harman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison M. Harman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison M. Harman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alison M. Harman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison M. Harman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison M. Harman. The network helps show where Alison M. Harman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alison M. Harman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alison M. Harman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alison M. Harman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alison M. Harman. Alison M. Harman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 68 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | Human RPE development | 1 |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | Common Cell Types and Patterns of Laminar Distribution in Marsupial and Eutherian Visual Cortex Identify Components Essential for Neocortical Function | 2 |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 39 |
About Alison M. Harman
Alison M. Harman is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Developmental Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (33 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (13 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (392 citations), Equine (65 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (118 citations). Alison M. Harman has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include L.D. Beazley, R.V. Hoskins, Paul McGreevy, Stephen Moore, Stephen Moore, Glen Jeffery, Sarah A. Dunlop, Patricia A. Fleming, John H. Hogben and P. Keller. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.