Peter D. Spear
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 36
- Neural dynamics and brain function 14
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 19
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 8
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 6
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research 5
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 5
- Neurology top 10%
-
- Retinal Development and Disorders 25
- Co-authors
- Lillian TongJ. Jay BraunKenneth E. KratzAneeq AhmadKao Liang ChowRonald E. KalilTheresa E. HickeyCharles Cresson Wood
- Journals
- Brain Research (16 papers)The Journal of Comparative Neurology (11 papers)Visual Neuroscience (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter D. Spear
53 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.3k
- Ophthalmology 400
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 740
- Sensory Systems 101
- Neurology 132
Countries citing papers authored by Peter D. Spear
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter D. Spear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter D. Spear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter D. Spear more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter D. Spear
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter D. Spear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter D. Spear. The network helps show where Peter D. Spear may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter D. Spear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 145 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 19 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 37 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 58 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 31 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 11 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 14 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 313 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 16 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 28 | |
| 15 | 1990 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 13 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 21 | |
| 18 | Psychology: Perspectives on Behavior | 1988 | 9 |
| 19 | 1987 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1974 | 46 |
About Peter D. Spear
Peter D. Spear is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (36 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (25 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (19 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (14 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (6 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.3k citations), Ophthalmology (400 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (740 citations), Sensory Systems (101 citations) and Neurology (132 citations). Peter D. Spear has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lillian Tong, J. Jay Braun, Kenneth E. Kratz, Aneeq Ahmad, Kao Liang Chow, Ronald E. Kalil, Theresa E. Hickey, Charles Cresson Wood, Jonathan B. Levitt and J. Anthony Movshon. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Visual Neuroscience, Experimental Neurology and Developmental Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.