Alicia Danforth
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies 8
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Toxicology top 2%
-
- Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior 3
- Organic Chemistry top 2%
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids 4
-
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research 5
-
- Family Dynamics and Relationships 1
-
- Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques 1
-
- Diverse academic research themes 1
-
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 1
- Co-authors
- Charles S. GrobCharles R. McKayAdam L. HalberstadtGeorge GreerBerra Yazar‐KlosinskiLisa JeromeB. AndersonNick Walker
- Journals
- Biological Psychiatry (1 paper)Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (1 paper)Neuropharmacology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandArgentina
In The Last Decade
Alicia Danforth
9 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Clinical Psychology 1.3k
- Biological Psychiatry 83
- Toxicology 108
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 569
- Organic Chemistry 722
Countries citing papers authored by Alicia Danforth
This map shows the geographic impact of Alicia Danforth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alicia Danforth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alicia Danforth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alicia Danforth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alicia Danforth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alicia Danforth. The network helps show where Alicia Danforth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Alicia Danforth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 177 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 161 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 75 | |
| 9 | Pilot Study of Psilocybin Treatment for Anxiety in Patients With Advanced-Stage Cancerbreakdown → | 2010 | 845 |
| 10 | A psychosocial description of a select group of infertile couples. | 1988 | 9 |
About Alicia Danforth
Alicia Danforth is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management and Organic Chemistry, having authored 10 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (8 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (5 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (4 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (1 paper), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper), Diverse academic research themes (1 paper) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.3k citations), Biological Psychiatry (83 citations), Toxicology (108 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (569 citations) and Organic Chemistry (722 citations). Alicia Danforth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Charles S. Grob, Charles R. McKay, Adam L. Halberstadt, George Greer, Berra Yazar‐Klosinski, Lisa Jerome, B. Anderson, Nick Walker, Amy Emerson and Allison A. Feduccia. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, Neuropharmacology, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry and EClinicalMedicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.