Alice Fleerackers

455 total citations
26 papers, 182 citations indexed

About

Alice Fleerackers is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. According to data from OpenAlex, Alice Fleerackers has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 182 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 11 papers in Information Systems and Management and 10 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. Recurrent topics in Alice Fleerackers's work include Academic Publishing and Open Access (11 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (10 papers) and Social Media in Health Education (9 papers). Alice Fleerackers is often cited by papers focused on Academic Publishing and Open Access (11 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (10 papers) and Social Media in Health Education (9 papers). Alice Fleerackers collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Alice Fleerackers's co-authors include Juan Pablo Alperín, Michelle Riedlinger, Rukhsana Ahmed, Lauren A. Maggio, Lara B. Aknin, J. Kiley Hamlin, Lisa Matthias, Stefanie Haustein, Chelsea L. Ratcliff and Jakob D. Jensen and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Academic Medicine and Medical Education.

In The Last Decade

Alice Fleerackers

21 papers receiving 169 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Alice Fleerackers Canada 7 77 56 53 47 45 26 182
Theiss Bendixen Denmark 7 69 0.9× 26 0.5× 66 1.2× 29 0.6× 4 0.1× 21 194
Lars König Germany 9 104 1.4× 9 0.2× 3 0.1× 35 0.7× 41 0.9× 21 255
Bekaidar Nurmashev Kazakhstan 6 10 0.1× 51 0.9× 77 1.5× 17 0.4× 7 0.2× 10 239
Nicholas LaBerge United States 3 48 0.6× 9 0.2× 22 0.4× 4 0.1× 3 0.1× 6 171
Baijing Hu China 3 122 1.6× 14 0.3× 27 0.6× 39 0.9× 4 178
Warren Tierney Singapore 4 26 0.3× 11 0.2× 13 0.2× 7 0.1× 2 0.0× 8 117
Bojana Većkalov Netherlands 7 97 1.3× 5 0.1× 3 0.1× 31 0.7× 9 0.2× 12 143
Ryan P. Foley United States 5 96 1.2× 11 0.2× 30 0.6× 13 0.3× 7 189
Marko Bachl Germany 9 134 1.7× 3 0.1× 3 0.1× 19 0.4× 137 3.0× 34 263
Pamela R. Buckley United States 10 36 0.5× 5 0.1× 17 0.3× 20 0.4× 1 0.0× 21 277

Countries citing papers authored by Alice Fleerackers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alice Fleerackers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alice Fleerackers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alice Fleerackers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alice Fleerackers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alice Fleerackers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alice Fleerackers. The network helps show where Alice Fleerackers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alice Fleerackers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alice Fleerackers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alice Fleerackers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alice Fleerackers. Alice Fleerackers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Alperín, Juan Pablo, et al.. (2025). Preprint servers and journals: rivals or allies?. Journal of Documentation. 81(4). 847–869. 1 indexed citations
2.
Fleerackers, Alice, et al.. (2025). Amplifying the News: An Analysis of the Factors Driving Republication and Facebook Engagement with News. Journalism Practice. 1–20. 1 indexed citations
3.
Fleerackers, Alice, et al.. (2024). Bridging science communication and open science—Working inclusively toward the common good. Frontiers in Communication. 9. 1 indexed citations
4.
Alperín, Juan Pablo, Alice Fleerackers, Michelle Riedlinger, & Stefanie Haustein. (2024). Second-order citations in altmetrics: A case study analyzing the audiences of COVID-19 research in the news and on social media. Quantitative Science Studies. 5(2). 366–382. 6 indexed citations
5.
Fleerackers, Alice, et al.. (2024). Unreviewed science in the news: The evolution of preprint media coverage from 2014–2021. Quantitative Science Studies. 5(2). 297–316. 4 indexed citations
6.
Pinfield, Stephen, Pamela Abbott, Andrew Cox, et al.. (2024). The impact of COVID-19 on the debate on open science: a qualitative analysis of published materials from the period of the pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 11(1). 1 indexed citations
7.
Fleerackers, Alice, et al.. (2024). Public understanding of preprints: How audiences make sense of unreviewed research in the news. Public Understanding of Science. 34(2). 154–171.
9.
Maggio, Lauren A., et al.. (2024). ‘My doctor self and my human self’: A qualitative study of physicians' presentation of self on social media. Medical Education. 58(10). 1192–1204. 2 indexed citations
10.
Fleerackers, Alice, et al.. (2024). Teaching to bridge research and practice: perspectives from science communication educators across the world. Journal of Science Communication. 23(2). 3 indexed citations
11.
Alperín, Juan Pablo, et al.. (2024). Stark Decline in Journalists’ Use of Preprints Postpandemic. Science Communication. 47(6). 897–905.
12.
Fleerackers, Alice, et al.. (2023). ``It's my job'': a qualitative study of the mediatization of science within the scientist-journalist relationship. Journal of Science Communication. 22(4). 1 indexed citations
13.
Fleerackers, Alice, et al.. (2022). Identifying science in the news: An assessment of the precision and recall of Altmetric.com news mention data. Scientometrics. 127(11). 6109–6123. 12 indexed citations
14.
Fleerackers, Alice, Michelle Riedlinger, Axel Bruns, & Jean Burgess. (2022). Academic explanatory journalism and emerging COVID-19 science: how social media accounts amplify The Conversation’s preprint coverage. Media International Australia. 192(1). 130–149. 3 indexed citations
15.
Fleerackers, Alice, et al.. (2022). Identifying science in the news: An assessment of the precision and recall of Altmetric.com news mention data. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).
16.
Fleerackers, Alice, et al.. (2022). Science in motion: A qualitative analysis of journalists’ use and perception of preprints. PLoS ONE. 17(11). e0277769–e0277769. 13 indexed citations
17.
Maggio, Lauren A. & Alice Fleerackers. (2022). Preprints in Health Professions Education: Raising Awareness and Shifting Culture. Academic Medicine. 98(1). 17–20. 2 indexed citations
18.
Fleerackers, Alice, et al.. (2022). Why create SciArt? An investigation into science artists' goals and professional journeys. Journal of Science Communication. 21(6). A05–A05. 2 indexed citations
19.
Fleerackers, Alice, et al.. (2020). “When I saw my peers annotating”. Information and Learning Sciences. 121(3/4). 207–230. 19 indexed citations
20.
Aknin, Lara B., Alice Fleerackers, & J. Kiley Hamlin. (2014). Can third-party observers detect the emotional rewards of generous spending?. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 9(3). 198–203. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026