Alice Fleerackers

21 papers receiving 169 citations

Peers

Alice Fleerackers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Information Systems and Management 56
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 53
  • Communication 45
  • Health 47
  • Applied Psychology 11
Replace Theiss Bendixen with:
Theiss Bendixen Denmark
Lars König Germany
JP Prims United States
Bojana Većkalov Netherlands
Warren Tierney Singapore
Baijing Hu China
Nicholas LaBerge United States
Ryan P. Foley United States
Bekaidar Nurmashev Kazakhstan
Julie Nguyen United States
Alice Fleerackers relative to Theiss Bendixen Denmark Theiss Bendixen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.3×
Theiss Bendixen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alice Fleerackers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alice Fleerackers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alice Fleerackers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alice Fleerackers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alice Fleerackers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alice Fleerackers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alice Fleerackers. The network helps show where Alice Fleerackers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alice Fleerackers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alice Fleerackers Line = papers co-authored together Alice Fleerackers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202167
2 202019
3 201417
4 202213
5 202212
6 202012
7 202311
8 20246
9 20244
10 20223
11 20243
12 20242
13 20222
14 20222
15 20222
16 20241
17 20251
18 20251
19 20241
20 20251

About Alice Fleerackers

Alice Fleerackers is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Health and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 182 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic Publishing and Open Access (11 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (10 papers), Social Media in Health Education (9 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (8 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 papers), Science Education and Perceptions (3 papers), Research Data Management Practices (3 papers) and Social Media and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (56 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (53 citations), Communication (45 citations), Health (47 citations) and Applied Psychology (11 citations). Alice Fleerackers has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Juan Pablo Alperín, Michelle Riedlinger, Rukhsana Ahmed, Lara B. Aknin, J. Kiley Hamlin, Lauren A. Maggio, Lisa Matthias, Andy J. King, Chelsea L. Ratcliff and Stefanie Haustein. Their work appears in journals such as Health Communication, Quantitative Science Studies, Frontiers in Communication, Public Understanding of Science and The Journal of Positive Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact