Peter Claessens

422 total citations
19 papers, 307 citations indexed

About

Peter Claessens is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Claessens has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 307 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Peter Claessens's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Color Science and Applications (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). Peter Claessens is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Color Science and Applications (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). Peter Claessens collaborates with scholars based in Brazil, Belgium and Türkiye. Peter Claessens's co-authors include André M. Cravo, Marcus Vinícius C. Baldo, Johan Wagemans, Marcelo S. Caetano, Yossi Zana, Fuat Balcı, Raphael Y. de Camargo, João Ricardo Sato, Bert Broeckaert and Peter Stalmans and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Neuropsychologia and Experimental Brain Research.

In The Last Decade

Peter Claessens

19 papers receiving 302 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Claessens Brazil 8 274 59 58 55 19 19 307
Darya Frank United Kingdom 7 234 0.9× 45 0.8× 45 0.8× 57 1.0× 6 0.3× 10 296
Tarryn Balsdon Australia 10 255 0.9× 28 0.5× 24 0.4× 81 1.5× 25 1.3× 18 313
Sofie V. Gelskov Denmark 7 221 0.8× 30 0.5× 24 0.4× 52 0.9× 19 1.0× 7 304
Yang-Ming Huang Taiwan 7 249 0.9× 71 1.2× 41 0.7× 112 2.0× 5 0.3× 10 333
Jorge Morales United States 9 281 1.0× 31 0.5× 20 0.3× 75 1.4× 13 0.7× 21 352
Nickolaos Fragopanagos United Kingdom 5 258 0.9× 49 0.8× 19 0.3× 89 1.6× 8 0.4× 5 324
Alessandro Tomassini United Kingdom 8 175 0.6× 14 0.2× 26 0.4× 36 0.7× 6 0.3× 14 209
Herbert Hagendorf Germany 12 292 1.1× 42 0.7× 9 0.2× 85 1.5× 6 0.3× 26 353
Teresa Diéguez-Risco Spain 11 305 1.1× 75 1.3× 17 0.3× 141 2.6× 3 0.2× 13 356
Zhiheng Zhou United States 7 237 0.9× 38 0.6× 14 0.2× 47 0.9× 44 2.3× 18 282

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Claessens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Claessens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Claessens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Claessens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Claessens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Claessens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Claessens. The network helps show where Peter Claessens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Claessens

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Claessens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Claessens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Claessens. Peter Claessens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Claessens, Peter, et al.. (2022). Leitura de palavras e pseudopalavras em adultos jovens: um estudo de rastreamento ocular. CoDAS. 34(4). e20200333–e20200333. 4 indexed citations
2.
Claessens, Peter, et al.. (2021). The role of time estimation in decreased impatience in intertemporal choice.. Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics. 14(3). 185–196. 7 indexed citations
3.
Zana, Yossi, et al.. (2019). Effect of Presentation Format on Judgment of Long-Range Time Intervals. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 1479–1479. 4 indexed citations
4.
Sato, João Ricardo, et al.. (2018). A common representation of time across visual and auditory modalities. Neuropsychologia. 119. 223–232. 11 indexed citations
5.
Caetano, Marcelo S., et al.. (2017). Individual differences in long-range time representation. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 79(3). 833–840. 7 indexed citations
6.
Claessens, Peter, et al.. (2016). Low-frequency cortical oscillations are modulated by temporal prediction and temporal error coding. NeuroImage. 146. 40–46. 10 indexed citations
7.
Claessens, Peter, et al.. (2014). Modulation of perceived contrast in the brightness comparison of asynchronous stimuli. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 77(1). 234–248. 1 indexed citations
8.
Cravo, André M., et al.. (2013). Bias and learning in temporal binding: Intervals between actions and outcomes are compressed by prior bias. Consciousness and Cognition. 22(4). 1174–1180. 23 indexed citations
9.
Cravo, André M., Peter Claessens, & Marcus Vinícius C. Baldo. (2010). The relation between action, predictability and temporal contiguity in temporal binding. Acta Psychologica. 136(1). 157–166. 64 indexed citations
10.
Cravo, André M., Peter Claessens, & Marcus Vinícius C. Baldo. (2009). Voluntary action and causality in temporal binding. Experimental Brain Research. 199(1). 95–99. 68 indexed citations
11.
Claessens, Peter & Johan Wagemans. (2008). A Bayesian framework for cue integration in multistable grouping: Proximity, collinearity, and orientation priors in zigzag lattices. Journal of Vision. 8(7). 33–33. 44 indexed citations
12.
Claessens, Peter & Johan Wagemans. (2005). Perceptual grouping in Gabor lattices: Proximity and alignment. Perception & Psychophysics. 67(8). 1446–1459. 53 indexed citations
13.
Claessens, Peter, et al.. (2005). Perceptual distortion in the visual field surrounding a scotoma: Psychophysical measurement with a “spatial interval discrimination task”. International Congress Series. 1282. 749–753. 4 indexed citations
14.
Broeckaert, Bert & Peter Claessens. (2003). Physician-assisted death: From euthanasia to the withholding of life-sustaining treatment. 43(4). 1 indexed citations
15.
Casterlé, Bernadette Dierckx de, et al.. (2001). Clinical Leadership Development Project: an intervention study to enhance transformational leadership style of head nurses in the realm of skilled companionship. Fase 2. Rapport Onderzoeksproject Ministerie van Sociale Zaken, Volksgezondheid en Leefmilieu, Centrum voor Ziekenhuis- en Verplegingswetenschap (Leuven), Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven (Leuven), Unité des Sciences Hospitalières et Médico-Sociales (Bruxelles), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (Bruxelles). 1 indexed citations
16.
Claessens, Peter, et al.. (2000). Lived experiences of adult patients with congenital heart disease. 1 indexed citations
17.
Wagemans, Johan, et al.. (1999). Perceptual organization of Gabor lattices: Relations between Gestalt principles of grouping-by-proximity and grouping-by-similarity. Perception. 28. 1 indexed citations
18.
Wagemans, Johan, et al.. (1999). Interactions between grouping principles in Gabor lattices: Proximity and orientation alignment. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 40(4). 2 indexed citations
19.
Wagemans, Johan, et al.. (1999). Interactions between grouping principles in Gabor lattices: Proximity and orientation alignment (Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Sarasota, FL). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026