Alexander Poth

598 citations
23 papers · 116 indexed · h-index 7

Alexander Poth

18 papers receiving 110 citations

Peers

Alexander Poth
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Software 18
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 28
  • Information Systems 74
  • Management Information Systems 27
  • Computer Science Applications 6
Replace Oliver Linssen with:
Oliver Linssen Denmark
Oisín Cawley Ireland
Rashidah Kasauli Sweden
Özden Özcan‐Top Türkiye
Agnès Front France
Alexandre Vasconcelos Brazil
Matthias Wißotzki Germany
Cristina Palomares Spain
Clênio F. Salviano Brazil
Andrea Morichetta Italy
Alexander Poth relative to Oliver Linssen Denmark Oliver Linssen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Oliver Linssen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Poth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Poth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Poth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Poth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander Poth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Poth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Poth. The network helps show where Alexander Poth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Alexander Poth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alexander Poth Line = papers co-authored together Alexander Poth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20250
3 20246
4 20241
5 20240
6 20224
7 20215
8 20219
9 20216
10 20212
11 20202
12 20209
13 201827
14 20164
15 201514
16
Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement: 21st European Conference, EuroSPI 2014, Luxembourg, June 25-27, 2014. Proceedings
20140
17 201311
18 20100
19 20093
20 20058

About Alexander Poth

Alexander Poth is a scholar working on Software, Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Information Systems, Information Systems and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 23 papers that have together received 116 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (13 papers), Collaboration in agile enterprises (7 papers), Software Engineering Research (4 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (3 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (3 papers), Information Technology Governance and Strategy (3 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (3 papers) and Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (18 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (28 citations), Information Systems (74 citations), Management Information Systems (27 citations) and Computer Science Applications (6 citations). Alexander Poth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Riel, Antoni‐Lluís Mesquida, Antònia Mas, Ali Sunyaev, Mark‐Oliver Reiser, Rory V. O’Connor, Andrea Arcuri, M. Weber, Richard Messnarz and Murat Yılmaz. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Software, Automated Software Engineering, Software Quality Journal, Journal of Software Evolution and Process and Software Process Improvement and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026