Software Process Improvement and Practice

347 papers and 3.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 347 papers published in Software Process Improvement and Practice in the last decades have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Software Process Improvement and Practice usually cover Information Systems (296 papers), Management Information Systems (140 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (79 papers) specifically the topics of Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (243 papers), Software Engineering Research (164 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (98 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Software Process Improvement and Practice are Ulrich W. Eisenecker, Krzysztof Czarnecki, Simon Helsen, Daniel M. Germán, Ita Richardson, Dirk Stelzer, Werner Mellis, David Wilson, Darja Šmite and Mahmood Niazi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Software Process Improvement and Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Software Process Improvement and Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Software Process Improvement and Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Software Process Improvement and Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Software Process Improvement and Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Software Process Improvement and Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Software Process Improvement and Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025