Alexander Peine
- Demography top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 2%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 1%
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Louis NevenHarro van LenteBritt ÖstlundBjörn FischerAndrea HerrmannEllen H.M. MoorsTineke van der SchoorBert Scholtens
- Topics
- Technology Use by Older Adults (18 papers)Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (16 papers)Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (12 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaResearch PolicyInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsSwedenGermany
In The Last Decade
Alexander Peine
50 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Demography 558
- Sociology and Political Science 378
- Management of Technology and Innovation 255
- Human-Computer Interaction 239
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 198
Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Peine
This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Peine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Peine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Peine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander Peine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Peine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Peine. The network helps show where Alexander Peine may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexander Peine
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexander Peine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexander Peine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alexander Peine. Alexander Peine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 40 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | Socio-gerontechnology : Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology | 29 |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | Long-term structural development. | 1 |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Alexander Peine
Alexander Peine is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Management of Technology and Innovation and Health Informatics, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Use by Older Adults (18 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (16 papers) and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (198 citations), Demography (558 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (239 citations). Alexander Peine has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Louis Neven, Harro van Lente, Britt Östlund, Björn Fischer, Andrea Herrmann, Ellen H.M. Moors, Tineke van der Schoor, Bert Scholtens, Wouter Boon and Alex Faulkner. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Research Policy and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.