Alexander P. Wind

14 total papers · 440 total citations
4 papers, 107 citations indexed

About

Alexander P. Wind is a scholar working on Surgery, Sociology and Political Science and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Alexander P. Wind has authored 4 papers receiving a total of 107 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Surgery, 1 paper in Sociology and Political Science and 1 paper in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Alexander P. Wind's work include Problem and Project Based Learning (1 paper), Cognitive Science and Mapping (1 paper) and Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper). Alexander P. Wind is often cited by papers focused on Problem and Project Based Learning (1 paper), Cognitive Science and Mapping (1 paper) and Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper). Alexander P. Wind collaborates with scholars based in United States. Alexander P. Wind's co-authors include J. D. Fletcher, David Yun Dai, Sigmund Tobias, Cory Adis and Amanda J. Koch and has published in prestigious journals such as Military Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Alexander P. Wind

4 papers receiving 95 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Alexander P. Wind	61	29	23	20	18	4	107
Alexandra Pomares	113 1.9×	58 2.0×	53 2.3×	15 0.8×	18 1.0×	8	259
Zoe Jones	16 0.3×	45 1.6×	34 1.5×	38 1.9×	21 1.2×	5	243
Mohamad Khatib	75 1.2×	9 0.3×	15 0.7×	8 0.4×	16 0.9×	7	228
Fred Wiegant	80 1.3×	12 0.4×	15 0.7×	9 0.5×	18 1.0×	5	234
Maja Flaig	94 1.5×	9 0.3×	15 0.7×	14 0.7×	19 1.1×	7	247
Stephanie Burger	72 1.2×	61 2.1×	32 1.4×	8 0.4×	31 1.7×	5	214
Guillermo Valdes	34 0.6×	30 1.0×	22 1.0×	44 2.2×	26 1.4×	5	241
Emily Conradi	41 0.7×	113 3.9×	110 4.8×	18 0.9×	10 0.6×	9	286
Irina V. Kapler	129 2.1×	7 0.2×	12 0.5×	8 0.4×	16 0.9×	5	245
Gordon Anderson	27 0.4×	11 0.4×	31 1.3×	6 0.3×	28 1.6×	9	290

Countries citing papers authored by Alexander P. Wind

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander P. Wind's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander P. Wind with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander P. Wind more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander P. Wind

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander P. Wind. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander P. Wind. The network helps show where Alexander P. Wind may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexander P. Wind

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexander P. Wind. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexander P. Wind based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alexander P. Wind. Alexander P. Wind is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact