Alexander P. Demos
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Roger ChaffinCaroline PalmėrJennifer DanielsKerry L. MarshStefan DebenerMartin G. BleichnerAnna ZammAnna‐Katharina R. Bauer
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Music Perception (22 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (12 papers)Action Observation and Synchronization (12 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyNature reviews. NeuroscienceTrends in Cognitive Sciences
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Alexander P. Demos
44 papers receiving 591 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Cognitive Neuroscience 395
- Social Psychology 252
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 130
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 80
- Applied Psychology 72
Countries citing papers authored by Alexander P. Demos
This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander P. Demos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander P. Demos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander P. Demos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander P. Demos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander P. Demos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander P. Demos. The network helps show where Alexander P. Demos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexander P. Demos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexander P. Demos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexander P. Demos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alexander P. Demos. Alexander P. Demos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | Capturing Intra- and Inter-Brain Dynamics with Recurrence Quantification Analysis. | 1 |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 30 | |
| 20 | 109 |
About Alexander P. Demos
Alexander P. Demos is a scholar working on Music, Cognitive Neuroscience and Applied Psychology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 616 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (22 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (12 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (395 citations), Music (62 citations) and Applied Psychology (72 citations). Alexander P. Demos has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Roger Chaffin, Caroline Palmėr, Jennifer Daniels, Kerry L. Marsh, Stefan Debener, Martin G. Bleichner, Anna Zamm, Anna‐Katharina R. Bauer, Marcelo M. Wanderley and Vivek Kant. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Nature reviews. Neuroscience and Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.