Alexander D. Veit

17 papers receiving 199 citations

Peers

Alexander D. Veit
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Computational Mathematics 9
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 82
  • Mechanics of Materials 60
  • Numerical Analysis 11
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 72
Replace Xiang-hua Wang with:
Xiang-hua Wang China
Federico Vernuccio Italy
Bryce Manifold United States
Brandon Buckley United States
Jonathan V. Thompson United States
Simon Labouesse France
Stanislav I. Fadeev Russia
Eleanor Crane United States
Anson H. L. Tang Hong Kong
Marcel Mokbel Germany
Alexander D. Veit relative to Xiang-hua Wang China Xiang-hua Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Xiang-hua Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alexander D. Veit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander D. Veit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander D. Veit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander D. Veit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander D. Veit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander D. Veit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander D. Veit. The network helps show where Alexander D. Veit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alexander D. Veit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alexander D. Veit Line = papers co-authored together Alexander D. Veit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 202278
2 201225
3 201319
4 201218
5 202317
6 200113
7 20159
8 20157
9 20175
10 20255
11 20234
12 20223
13 20142
14 20152
15 20222
16
Convolution quadrature for time-dependent Maxwell equations
20081
17 20251
18 20250

About Alexander D. Veit

Alexander D. Veit is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Computational Mathematics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computational Mechanics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 211 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (9 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (9 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (8 papers), Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (3 papers), Tensor decomposition and applications (3 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (3 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (9 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (82 citations), Mechanics of Materials (60 citations), Numerical Analysis (11 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (72 citations). Alexander D. Veit has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Sauter, Lehel Banjai, Jonas Ballani, Boris N. Khoromskij, Larkin Ridgway Scott, Isidro Cortés‐Ciriano, Kathleen H. Burns, Chong Chu, Peter J. Park and Eric W. Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Numerische Mathematik, Nature Communications, IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics and International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact